Cited by 167Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsWater Quality and Pollution Assessment

High levels of endocrine pollutants in US streams during low flow due to insufficient wastewater dilution

Rice, Jacelyn, Westerhoff, Paul·2017·Nature Geoscience

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ngeo2984

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Rice, J., & Westerhoff, P.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Westerhoff, Paul
Venue
Nature Geoscience
Published
2017-07-10
Volume
10
Issue
8
Pages
587-591
ISSN
  • 1752-0894 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-0908
OpenAlex
W2735001181
Cited by
167
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 1
FWCI
7.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nature Geoscience (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
Keywords
endocrine disruptors, wastewater discharge, dilution factor, low flow, river discharge, receiving streams, hydraulic modeling, safety thresholds, pollutant concentration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review