Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 305

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Radiocarbon Dating: An Archaeological Perspective

Morrison, David, Taylor, R. E.·1990·Arctic and Alpine Research

Abstract

A model describing the production, distribution, and decay of 14>sC led to a proposal that the 14>sC content of an organic sample could be used as an index of age. Willard F. Libby conducted the critical experiments which established the basic validity of the method during 1947-9. Since that time all of the 6 basic physical assumptions of the method have been the subject of continuing scrutiny. Archaeologists who rely on 14>sC values to construct their chron-ologies are especially concerned with errors that may be introduced as a result of violations of lte 1 of the fundamental assumptions. Error reduction strategies are best implemented by close interdisciplinary collaboration and cooperation between radiocarbon specialists and those engaged in archaeological research studies. See also AATA 16-1172.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1551730

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 305

Metadata

Authors
Morrison, D., & Taylor, R. E.
Venue
Arctic and Alpine Research
Published
1990-02
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
116
ISSN
0004-0851 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048692080
Cited by
305
References
0
FWCI
10.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Radiocarbon Dating: An Archaeological Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1551730
The paper
Morrison, D., & Taylor, R. E. (1990). Radiocarbon Dating: An Archaeological Perspective. Arctic and Alpine Research. https://doi.org/10.2307/1551730

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.