The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
Babylonian Chronology 626 B.C.-A.D. 75
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It is well-known that this timeline agrees well with archival evidence contemporary to the events. 1”
From The Day Before Cyrus Entered Babylon (2021) · cites this paper as Parker and Dubberstein 1956: 29
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The earliest datable observation of the aurora borealis
Stephenson, F. R., Willis, D. M., & Hallinan, T. J. (2004) · Astronomy and Geophysics · doi:10.1046/j.1468-4004.2003.45615.x · Cited by 46
Jursa, M. (2023) · The Oxford History of the Ancient Near East Volume V · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190687663.003.0050 · Cited by 28
The Day Before Cyrus Entered Babylon
Waerzeggers, C. (2021) · Individuals and Institutions in the Ancient Near East · doi:10.1515/9781501514661-002 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Goeseke, H., Parker, R. A., & Dubberstein, W. H.
- Venue
- Oriens
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1960
- Volume
- 13
- Pages
- 362
- ISSN
- 0078-6527 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3083306269
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 20 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oriens (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Near East History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Keywords
- Babylonian chronology, Babylonian history, Seleucid period, Parthian period, Sasanian period, ancient Near East, historical dating
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
