Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 261

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Food of Some Freshwater Cyclopoid Copepods and its Ecological Significance

Fryer, G.·1957·The Journal of Animal Ecology

Abstract

Considering the advanced state of our knowledge of the systematics of the freshwater cyclopoid copepods and the fact that many species are abundant in natural waters it is surprising that practically nothing is known of their food and feeding mechanisms. A few casual and often contradictory statements relating to the food of the group are to be found scattered through the literature but no definite study of the subject appears to have been made. Gurney's statement (1931) that 'it is most difficult to determine the food as it is generally impossible to recognize it from the contents of the gut' is too pessimistic, for by the employment of a very simple technique the nature of the gut contents can usually be revealed. The earliest references to the food of cyclopoids are to be found in writings dating back to the early years of the nineteenth century, but as Klugh (1927), who studied the feeding habits of certain freshwater crustaceans remarks 'the earlier writers on Entomostraca are extremely vague in their statements as to the food of these animals'. However, one of the earliest, Jurine (1820), made the observation, which seems to have been largely ignored by subsequent workers, that Cyclops is carnivorous. Birge (1897) (cited by Klugh 1927, and Gurney 1931) also claimed that Cyclops is partially carnivorous, eating rotifers, nauplii 'and other animals'. He also mentions a Cyclops, presumably a plankton species, feeding on Ceratium. Since these early days references to the food of cyclopoids have been made by Naumann (1918), Klugh (1927) and Vetter (1927a, b), though Vetter was interested in phytoplankton and its fate rather than in the food of cyclopoids. Neither he nor Naumann made specific determinations, a fact which robs their observations of much of their value, and neither added substantially to our knowledge. Klugh's work is still the most comprehensive review of the food of the freshwater Entomostraca, though he studied only two cyclopoid copepods-Macrocyclops fuscus and what would now be called Acanthocyclops bicuspidatus thomasi. The only food which he recorded from the gut of the latter species was the alga Chaetophora elegans, while from the gut of Macrocyclops fuscus he recorded 'palmella forms', a Chlamydomonas, and 'chitin fragments'. However, he also observed Macrocyclops fuscus seizing and partially devouring small specimens of its own species and of Diaptomus birgei. In addition a few casual statements from the literature deserve mention. Babaik (1913), cited by Oliva & Sladacek (1950), reports an attack on the larva of * Present address: East African Fisheries Research Organization, P.O. Box, 343, Jinja, Uganda.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1747

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Metadata

Authors
Fryer, G.
Venue
The Journal of Animal Ecology
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1957-11
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
263
ISSN
0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031452444
Cited by
261
References
9
FWCI
9.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Food of Some Freshwater Cyclopoid Copepods and its Ecological Significance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1747
The paper
Fryer, G. (1957). The Food of Some Freshwater Cyclopoid Copepods and its Ecological Significance. The Journal of Animal Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1747

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.