Cited by 138Spatial and Panel Data AnalysisStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceSurvey Sampling and Estimation Techniques

Estimation in Panel Models: Results on Pooling Cross-Sections and Time Series

Open access
Hannan, Michael T., Young, Alice A.·1977·Sociological Methodology

Abstract

The authors describe methodological issues of panel analysis designs; in particular, autocorrelation of errors across waves. They recommend constructing a “pooled” model of data from all waves to deal with design and estimation problems, and present results from a simulation of the behavior of alternate estimators for pooled models.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/270753

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hannan, M. T., & Young, A. A.
Venue
Sociological Methodology
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1977
Volume
8
Pages
52
ISSN
0081-1750 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2321416376
Cited by
138
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
31.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Sociological Methodology (publishedVersion)
  • OakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
Keywords
panel data models, autocorrelated errors, estimator performance, simulation study, panel design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review