The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Short‐Term Experimental Investigation of Resource Partitioning in a New Zealand Rocky Intertidal Habitat
Abstract
The effects of single—species removals on community composition and overt appearance were examined in an exposed, rocky, intertidal habitat at Anawhata, New Zealand. Two experiments were performed. A carnivorous starfish, Stichaster australis, was removed manually and kept removed from a stretch of shore for a period of 9 months (September 1968 through May 1969). This manipulation resulted in the mussel Perna canaliculus extending its vertical distribution by 40% of the available range, and a decrease in the species richness of the invaded area from 20 to 14 species. The second manipulation involved the removal of both Stichaster and a large brown alga, Durvillea antarctica, from two areas. Results were striking. Within 15 months 68% of the available space in one area, and 78% in the other, was occupied by Perna, to the almost total exclusion of other fauna or flora. These events not only duplicated the results of the Stichaster removal experiment, but also suggested that space, as the prime limiting requisite for Perna, could be occupied by that species alone throughout the middle and lower intertidal. The relative influences of predation and competition on the allocation of a basic resource are discussed in light of these experiments. Further, factors contributing to the competitive vigor of mussels are discussed,and the enigmatic relationship between Stichaster and another predator of comparable trophic status, Neothais, is probed. Finally, those general features of community structure especially sensitive to the ecological character of the predator, or the intensity of predation, are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brooks, J. L., & Dodson, S. I. (1965) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.150.3692.28 · Cited by 3,280
A note on trophic complexity and community stability.
Paine, R. T. (1969) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282586 · Cited by 1,796
Self-citation
Cited by
Food Webs: Linkage, Interaction Strength and Community Infrastructure
Paine, R. T. (1980) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4220 · Cited by 1,824
Self-citationPalaeoecology and evolution of marine hard substrate communities
Taylor, P. D., & Wilson, M. A. (2003) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0012-8252(02)00131-9 · Cited by 658
Peckarsky, B. L., Abrams, P. A., Bolnick, D. I., Dill, L. M., Grabowski, J. H., Luttbeg, B., Orrock, J. L., Peacor, S. D., Preisser, E. L., Schmitz, O. J., et al. (2008) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/07-1131.1 · Cited by 527
“Paine (1971) argued that a keystone predator must influence the density of the local competitive dominant species, usually by preferential consumption.”
BackgroundBertness, M. D., & Grosholz, E. (1985) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00384283 · Cited by 342
Food supply confers calcifiers resistance to ocean acidification
Ramajo, L., Pérez-León, E., Hendriks, I. E., Marbà, N., Krause-Jensen, D., Sejr, M. K., Blicher, M. E., Lagos, N. A., Olsen, Y. S., & Duarte, C. M. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep19374 · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- Paine, R. T.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1971-11
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1096-1106
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2073264590
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Short‐Term Experimental Investigation of Resource Partitioning in a New Zealand Rocky Intertidal Habitat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1933819
- The paper
- Paine, R. T. (1971). A Short‐Term Experimental Investigation of Resource Partitioning in a New Zealand Rocky Intertidal Habitat. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1933819
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.