The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Density Compensation in Island Faunas
Abstract
This paper analyzes factors determining the extent of density compensation on islands: i.e., is the summed population density of individuals of all species on islands equal to the summed mainland density as a result of niche expansions and higher abundances of island species compensating for the absence of many mainland species? In addition, a method is described for estimating bird population densities based on analysis of the time dependence or mist—netting yields. Puercos Island in the Pearl Archipelago off Panama has less than one—third as many resident birds species as comparable mainland habitats. Analysis of the Pearl avifauna suggests that about one—quarter of the island species may be relicts of the Pleistocene land bridge and that the remainder are subsequent over—water colonists. The successful colonists are a highly nonrandom sample of the mainland avifauna in such respects as family composition, social structure, and second—growth habitat origin. Song—based censuses and analysis of mist—netting show that Puercos has a slightly density of individuals than the mainland. Niche shifts between islands and mainland, or among different islands, include habitat expansions, wider ranges of vertical foraging strata, abundance increases checkerboard distribution patterns, and decreased morphological variability. Comparison of the present study with other studies shows that summed population densities on islands may be higher than, comparable to, or less than mainland levels, depending upon the particular island, habitat, and group of animals studied. Among factors affecting the extent of density colonists less appropriate to the vacated habitat, tending to lower island densities; and underrepresentation of large species on islands, tending to increase island population densities for a given biomass.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
THE ROLE OF INTRODUCED SPECIES IN THE DEGRADATION OF ISLAND ECOSYSTEMS: A Case History of Guam
Fritts, T. H., & Rodda, G. H. (1998) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.113 · Cited by 601
The Causes and Consequences of Compensatory Dynamics in Ecological Communities
Gonzalez, A., & Loreau, M. (2009) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173349 · Cited by 537
Peres, C. A., & Dolman, P. M. (2000) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/pl00008845 · Cited by 304
Ecology versus History as Determinants of Patchy and Insular Distributions in High Andean Birds
Vuilleumier, F., & Simberloff, D. (1980) · Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-6959-6_5 · Cited by 93
Livezey, B. C. (2003) · Ornithological Monographs · doi:10.2307/40168337 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- MacArthur, R. H., Diamond, J. M., & Karr, J. R.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1972-03
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 330-342
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2163423477
- Cited by
- 661
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Density Compensation in Island Faunas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1934090
- The paper
- MacArthur, R. H., Diamond, J. M., & Karr, J. R. (1972). Density Compensation in Island Faunas. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1934090
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.