The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Root Productivity and Turnover in Native Prairie
Abstract
Quantitative measurements of root systems on a seasonal basis for a 34—inch profile in Central Missouri Prairie ranged from 1,449 g/m 2 prior to resumption of growth in the spring to 1,901 g/m 2 at the end of the growing season. Underground parts in the upper 2 in. of the profile varied from 48% of the total quantity in April to 60% in July. Over 80% of the root mass occurred in the A_1 horizon, or the top 10 in. of the profile. Annual increment in the A_1 horizon or surface 10 in. was 429 g/m 2. In the A_2 horizon, 10—18 in., the measurement was 40 g/m 2 and in the B 2 horizon, 18—30 in., 41 g/m 2. These values were approximately 25% of the maximum dry matter measurement for each profile level, suggesting a turnover for the root system as a whole every 4 years. Variations in turnover for different parts of the root system were indicated, however, as shown by an annual loss of 22.8% for rhizomes, and 40.8% for roots in the 0— to 2—in. zone. Decomposition constants showed a marked decrease with depth, ranging from 4.3% in the A_1 horizon to 0.8% in the B 2 horizon. Estimated time required to reach 99% organic matter equilibrium under present conditions of production and breakdown was 110, 420, and 590 years for the A_1, A_2, and B 2 horizons respectively. Increasing time values would be expected with increasing depth as the reduction in annual increment was proportionately greater at lower levels in the profile than that for the total root—humus product.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes
Jackson, R. B., Canadell, J., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A., Sala, O. E., & Schulze, E. D. (1996) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00333714 · Cited by 3,071
Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems
GILL, R. A., & JACKSON, R. B. (2000) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00681.x · Cited by 1,300
Plant decomposition and soil respiration in terrestrial ecosystems
Singh, J. S., & Gupta, S. R. (1977) · The Botanical Review · doi:10.1007/bf02860844 · Cited by 788
Carbon sequestration in perennial bioenergy, annual corn and uncultivated systems in southern Quebec
Zan, C. S., Fyles, J. W., Girouard, P., & Samson, R. A. (2001) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(00)00273-5 · Cited by 218
Differential priming of soil carbon driven by soil depth and root impacts on carbon availability
de Graaff, M.-A., Jastrow, J. D., Gillette, S., Johns, A., & Wullschleger, S. D. (2014) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.10.047 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- Dahlman, R. C., & Kucera, C. L.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1965-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 84-89
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2035351022
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Root Productivity and Turnover in Native Prairie. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1935260
- The paper
- Dahlman, R. C., & Kucera, C. L. (1965). Root Productivity and Turnover in Native Prairie. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1935260
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.