The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Time Budgeting and Group Size: A Test of Theory
Abstract
Foraging flocks of granivorous Yellow—eyed Juncos (Junco phaeonotus) were studied for two winters to test hypothesized relationships between group size and time budgets. Required feeding time is so large that it constrains aggression. At low temperatures (high foraging requirements) a large flock forms in the area of maximal food availability. Group size decreases at warmer temperatures, since the constraints on aggression are reduced. Group size variance responds similarly. As group size increases, individuals scan less often for approaching predators. The time saved is employed to increase feeding rates, unless aggression levels are extremely high. Rates of aggressive interaction increase with group size, and with both ambient temperature and food density. Dominants apparently forage more efficiently than subordinates because of differences in habitat utilization and time allocation. These differences are consistent with the hypothesized correlation between increasing dominance and greater overwinter survivorship.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational study of behavior: sampling methods
Altmann, J. (1974) · Behaviour · doi:10.1163/156853974x00534 · Cited by 13,891
Hamilton, W. D. (1971) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(71)90189-5 · Cited by 3,506
Social Organization of Hamadryas Baboons: A Field Study
Kummer, H. (1967) · Bibliotheca Primatologica · doi:10.1159/isbn.978-3-8055-0286-3 · Cited by 763
Cited by
Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus
Lima, S. L., & Dill, L. M. (1990) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/z90-092 · Cited by 8,196
PREDATOR VIGILANCE AND GROUP SIZE IN MAMMALS AND BIRDS: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE
ELGAR, M. A. (1989) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1989.tb00636.x · Cited by 1,119
Physiological Consequences of Habitat Selection
Huey, R. B. (1991) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285141 · Cited by 914
Why Lions Form Groups: Food is Not Enough
Packer, C., Scheel, D., & Pusey, A. E. (1990) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285079 · Cited by 651
Anthropological Applications of Optimal Foraging Theory: A Critical Review [and Comments and Reply]
Smith, E. A., Bettinger, R. L., Bishop, C. A., Blundell, V., Cashdan, E., Casimir, M. J., Christenson, A. L., Cox, B., Dyson-Hudson, R., Hayden, B., et al. (1983) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/203066 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Caraco, T.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1979-06
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 618-627
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2135812924
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Time Budgeting and Group Size: A Test of Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1936082
- The paper
- Caraco, T. (1979). Time Budgeting and Group Size: A Test of Theory. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936082
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.