The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Role of Foraging Profitability and Experience in Habitat Use by the Bluegill Sunfish
Abstract
This study integrates laboratory and field results to interpret habitat use and switching by individual bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Prey handling and search times for the bluegill were determined from laboratory feeding experiments at different prey sizes and densities in open water and sediment habitats. Relationships were then constructed to predict the expected return per unit time foraging in these habitats. Experience (learning) was found to increase foraging efficiency up to fourfold over the course of six to eight foraging bouts. A population of 225 bluegills was then introduced into a pond consisting predominantly of open water and sediment habitats. This population exhibited several habitat switches as resources declined during the 3—mo experiment; in addition, the population split over a 5—wk period, with individuals specializing on one habitat or the other. These specialists were considerably more successful than habitat generalists as measured by average amount of food in the stomachs. Return rates estimated from the laboratory experiments indicated that the two habitats were nearly equal in foraging profitability. The individual specialization indicated that learning and mutually interfering foraging mechanisms were involved in the species' use of the two habitats. The results suggest that learning and sampling are important aspects of both habitat use and the specialization of individuals within a population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem
Charnov, E. L. (1976) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(76)90040-x · Cited by 5,374
Optimal foraging in great tits (parus major)
COWIE, R. J. (1977) · Nature · doi:10.1038/268137a0 · Cited by 395
Cited by
The Ecology of Individuals: Incidence and Implications of Individual Specialization
Bolnick, D. I., Svanbäck, R., Fordyce, J. A., Yang, L. H., Davis, J. M., Hulsey, C. D., & Forister, M. L. (2003) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/343878 · Cited by 2,762
Experimental Tests of Optimal Habitat Use in Fish: The Role of Relative Habitat Profitability
Werner, E. E., Mittelbach, G. G., Hall, D. J., & Gilliam, J. F. (1983) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1937507 · Cited by 426
Self-citationTurner, A. M., & Mittelbach, G. G. (1990) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1938636 · Cited by 352
Self-citationIndividual Behavior and Higher-Order Species Interactions
Werner, E. E. (1992) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285395 · Cited by 226
Self-citationTejerina-Garro, F. L., Fortin, R., & Rodríguez, M. A. (1998) · Environmental Biology of Fishes · doi:10.1023/a:1007401714671 · Cited by 194
Metadata
- Authors
- Werner, E. E., Mittelbach, G. G., & Hall, D. J.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1981-02
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 116-125
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2057742847
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Role of Foraging Profitability and Experience in Habitat Use by the Bluegill Sunfish. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1936675
- The paper
- Werner, E. E., Mittelbach, G. G., & Hall, D. J. (1981). The Role of Foraging Profitability and Experience in Habitat Use by the Bluegill Sunfish. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936675
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.