The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Pisaster‐Tegula Interaction: Prey Patches, Predator Food Preference, and Intertidal Community Structure
Abstract
The herbivorous gastropod Tegula funebralis is not highly ranked in a food preference hierarchy of its major predator, the starfish Pisaster ochraceus, and exhibits a persistent broad overlap with it in the rocky intertidal zone at Mukkaw Bay, Washington. Observations on Tegula over a 5—yr period indicate that it settles high intertidally, lives there for 5—6 yr, and then tends to migrate lower into contact with Pisaster. Tegula lays down an annual growth line permitting it to be aged and a growth curve constructed. Analysis of relative growth and reproduction indicates that beyond a certain size (16 mm) large individuals perform less well in the upper than those in the lower intertidal zone. Pisaster consumes 25—28% of the adult Tegula per year in the area of spatial overlap, based on analysis of the age structure of 6—17 yr old Tegula, and by direct estimates of the percentage of the standing crop consumed annually. The relationship between Pisaster and sex ratio, relative energy limitation and reproductive output (fitness) of Tegula is discussed for three subpopulations. It is suggested that the implied results of the interaction is typical of that between a major predator and one of its less preferred prey. The prominent zonation exhibited by preferred prey, the observed intimacy of association of predator and less preferred prey, and the zoogeographic homogeneity of the Pacific rocky coastline community are discussed in relation to three intermeshing ecological processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brooks, J. L., & Dodson, S. I. (1965) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.150.3692.28 · Cited by 3,280
A note on trophic complexity and community stability.
Paine, R. T. (1969) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282586 · Cited by 1,796
Self-citation
Cited by
Food Webs: Linkage, Interaction Strength and Community Infrastructure
Paine, R. T. (1980) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4220 · Cited by 1,824
Self-citationMarine biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: what's known and what's next?
Gamfeldt, L., Lefcheck, J. S., Byrnes, J. E. K., Cardinale, B. J., Duffy, J. E., & Griffin, J. N. (2015) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/oik.01549 · Cited by 297
Sublethal consequences of stream-dwelling predatory stoneflies on mayfly growth and fecundity
Peckarsky, B. L., Cowan, C. A., Penton, M. A., & Anderson, C. (1993) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1939941 · Cited by 280
Winnie, J. A. (2012) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/11-1990.1 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Paine, R. T.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1969-11
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 950-961
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2029732055
- Cited by
- 515
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Pisaster‐Tegula Interaction: Prey Patches, Predator Food Preference, and Intertidal Community Structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1936888
- The paper
- Paine, R. T. (1969). The Pisaster‐Tegula Interaction: Prey Patches, Predator Food Preference, and Intertidal Community Structure. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936888
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.