The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trophic Cascades and Phytoplankton Community Structure
Abstract
Two predators of zooplankton, fish (yellow perch) and larval insects (Chaoborus), were manipulated within in situ mesocosms to assess their indirect effects on phytoplankton. The two predators caused similar reductions in zooplankton size and biomass, and as a consequence, zooplankton grazing rates on phytoplankton. However, phytoplankton increased relative to predator—free controls only in enclosures with fish and not in enclosures with Chaoborus, suggesting that fish have effects on phytoplankton independent of their effects on zooplankton grazing rates. Estimation of phosphorus excretion rates of zooplankton and fish suggests that fish render P more available to phytoplankton in two ways: (1) by directly excreting and egesting P, and (2) by increasing rates of P excretion by the zooplankton community. The latter effect resulted because small zooplankton have higher biomass—specific excretion rates than large zooplankton. The importance of nutrient regeneration is further supported by the response of phytoplankton community structure. Phytoplankton taxa exhibiting enhanced biomass in the presence of fish were those with high P requirements, including green and blue—green algae and dinoflagellates; other phytoplankton groups did not respond to manipulations. These results suggest that the mechanisms underlying the tropic cascade are complex and that predators affect phytoplankton by altering nutrient recycling rates as well as zooplankton grazing rates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plankton Community Structure and Limnetic Primary Production
Carpenter, S. R., & Kitchell, J. F. (1984) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284261 · Cited by 189
Cited by
THE NATURE AND CONSEQUENCES OF INDIRECT EFFECTS IN ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES
Wootton, J. T. (1994) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.25.110194.002303 · Cited by 1,151
BEHAVIORALLY MEDIATED TROPHIC CASCADES: EFFECTS OF PREDATION RISK ON FOOD WEB INTERACTIONS
Schmitz, O. J., Beckerman, A. P., & O’Brien, K. M. (1997) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1388:bmtceo]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 934
Cause-Effect Relationships in Energy Flow, Trophic Structure, and Interspecific Interactions
Hairston, & Hairston (1993) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285546 · Cited by 560
Species Turnover and the Regulation of Trophic Structure
Leibold, M. A., Chase, J. M., Shurin, J. B., & Downing, A. L. (1997) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.467 · Cited by 375
Terrestrial Trophic Cascades: How Much Do They Trickle?
Halaj, J., & Wise, D. H. (2001) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/319190 · Cited by 370
Metadata
- Authors
- Vanni, M. J., & Findlay, D. L.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-06
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 921-937
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W1964297591
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trophic Cascades and Phytoplankton Community Structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1937363
- The paper
- Vanni, M. J., & Findlay, D. L. (1990). Trophic Cascades and Phytoplankton Community Structure. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937363
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.