The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Foraging Efficiency and Habitat Switching in Competiting Sunfishes
Abstract
A series of experiments are presented which elucidate competitive interactions among 3 congeneric sunfishes (Centrarchidae). In the absence of competitors all species rank 2 habitats (vegetation, sediments) in the same order according to profitability but differ in their relative efficiencies at utilizing these habitats. The ordinal ranking of foraging efficiencies of these species in the 2 habitats permits qualitative predictions of the occurrence and order of habitat shifts as resources decline (competitive pressure increases). We present an experiment demonstrating such habitat shifts which corroborate these predictions. The patterns of habitat switching indicate that the addition of a competitor which is more effective in a given habitat can change the profitability ranking for a species to the extent that the preferred habitats are abandoned. Thus these results provide experimental evidence for the compression hypothesis as a mechanism for the development and maintenance of resource partitioning by habitat. Further, the ecological flexibility exhibited by the sunfish indicates that overlap or co—utilization of habitats can be a very dynamic process, determined by the relation between resource levels and differences in foraging efficiencies among species. The implications of these results to competition, optimal use of a patchy environment, and species abundance relations in natural lakes are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem
Charnov, E. L. (1976) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(76)90040-x · Cited by 5,374
Cited by
Foraging Efficiency and Body Size: A Study of Optimal Diet and Habitat Use by Bluegills
Mittelbach, G. G. (1981) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1937300 · Cited by 915
Experimental Tests of Optimal Habitat Use in Fish: The Role of Relative Habitat Profitability
Werner, E. E., Mittelbach, G. G., Hall, D. J., & Gilliam, J. F. (1983) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1937507 · Cited by 426
Self-citationPrey Refuges Affecting Interactions Between Piscivorous Perch and Juvenile Perch and Roach
Persson, L., & Eklov, P. (1995) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1940632 · Cited by 384
Eby, L. A., & Crowder, L. B. (2002) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f02-067 · Cited by 310
Individual Behavior and Higher-Order Species Interactions
Werner, E. E. (1992) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285395 · Cited by 226
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Werner, E. E., & Hall, D. J.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1979-04
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 256-264
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2323445640
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Foraging Efficiency and Habitat Switching in Competiting Sunfishes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1937653
- The paper
- Werner, E. E., & Hall, D. J. (1979). Foraging Efficiency and Habitat Switching in Competiting Sunfishes. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937653
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.