The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Niche Concept Revisited: Mechanistic Models and Community Context
Abstract
The niche concept is a central organizing aspect of modern ecology. Although its history has often been reviewed, the structure of the concept and its connection to advances in ecological theory has received less recent attention. I review the niche concept using “mechanistic” models of community theory to identify two distinct components. One describes the environmental requirements of organisms and the other describes the per capita impact of organisms on the environment. I argue that these correspond to significant differences between Grinnell's and Elton's concepts distinct from the previously discussed “habitat” vs. “functional” dichotomy. I illustrate the distinction between the requirement and impact components of the niche using models of resource competition and of keystone predators, and I discuss “Gause's axiom” and conventional “niche theory” in the context of these two distinct niche components. I suggest that the niche concept be elucidated by explicit reference to these two distinct components; the “impact” niche (corresponding to Elton's concept) describing instantaneous per—capita effects of species on the environment, and the “requirement” niche describing the responses of species to the environment (corresponding to Hutchinson's definition). This approach connects conventional niche theory with “mechanistic” individual—based ecological models and can help provide a more modern context for the niche concept.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE
Hooper, D. U., Chapin, F. S., Ewel, J. J., Hector, A., Inchausti, P., Lavorel, S., Lawton, J. H., Lodge, D. M., Loreau, M., Naeem, S., et al. (2005) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/04-0922 · Cited by 8,046
Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology
Guisan, A., & Zimmermann, N. E. (2000) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/s0304-3800(00)00354-9 · Cited by 7,359
Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity
Chesson, P. (2000) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343 · Cited by 6,645
Pearson, R. G., & Dawson, T. P. (2003) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1046/j.1466-822x.2003.00042.x · Cited by 4,252
Competitive exclusion and limiting similarity: A unified theory
Meszéna, G., Gyllenberg, M., Pásztor, L., & Metz, J. A. J. (2006) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tpb.2005.07.001 · Cited by 298
Biodiversity effects increase linearly with biotope space
Dimitrakopoulos, P. G., & Schmid, B. (2004) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00607.x · Cited by 259
Fanelli, E., Azzurro, E., Bariche, M., Cartes, J. E., & Maynou, F. (2015) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-015-0868-5 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Leibold, M. A.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-07
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1371-1382
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W1994442418
- Cited by
- 687
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.