The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ecological Interpretation of Leaf Carbon Isotope Ratios: Influence of Respired Carbon Dioxide
Abstract
In a Neotropical moist forest at Barro Colorado Island, Panama, °13 C values of CO 2 in air and °13 values of leaf tissue exhibit parallel patterns of variation between the forest floor and the canopy. During the daytime, °13 C values of CO 2 from air sampled at 1 m and 0.5 m were significantly less than that at 25 m. Based on mass balance equations, up to 18% of the CO 2 in air at 0.5 m above the forest floor is from respiration. Respired CO 2 is responsible for 31 and 37% of the variation in isotope composition in leaves of two species of herbaceous bamboo grown in a well—ventilated sun treatment and in the forest understory. Respired CO 2 accounts for 45—70% of the difference in °13 C values between understory and canopy leaves for three species growing in large—scale irrigation and control treatments. Understory leaves of these species show °13 values consistent with higher ratios of intercellular to ambient CO 2 in irrigated relative to control treatments. Estimates of water—use efficiency from leaf carbon isotope content should be corrected for the contribution of the carbon isotope composition of respired CO 2 in closed—canopy forests.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Craig, H. (1957) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(57)90024-8 · Cited by 4,170
Cited by
Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Photosynthesis
Farquhar, G. D., Ehleringer, J. R., & Hubick, K. T. (1989) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002443 · Cited by 7,063
The application and interpretation of Keeling plots in terrestrial carbon cycle research
Pataki, D. E., Ehleringer, J. R., Flanagan, L. B., Yakir, D., Bowling, D. R., Still, C. J., Buchmann, N., Kaplan, J. O., & Berry, J. A. (2003) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2001gb001850 · Cited by 745
Variation in foliar δ13C in Hawaiian Metrosideros polymorpha: a case of internal resistance?
Vitousek, P. M., Field, C. B., & Matson, P. A. (1990) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00329760 · Cited by 273
Radiocarbon Anomalies from Old CO2 in the Soil and Canopy Air
Soter, S. (2011) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/s0033822200034354 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Da Silveira, L., Sternberg, L., Mulkey, S. S., & Wright, S. J.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-10
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1317-1324
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2327310763
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecological Interpretation of Leaf Carbon Isotope Ratios: Influence of Respired Carbon Dioxide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1938191
- The paper
- Da Silveira, L., Sternberg, L., Mulkey, S. S., & Wright, S. J. (1989). Ecological Interpretation of Leaf Carbon Isotope Ratios: Influence of Respired Carbon Dioxide. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938191
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.