The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Role of Fine Roots in the Organic Matter and Nitrogen Budgets of Two Forested Ecosystems
Abstract
Standing crop, rates of production, mortality, decomposition, and nitrogen dynamics of two size classes of fine roots (0—05 mm and 0.5—3.0 mm diameter) were estimated for 1 yr in a 53—yr—old red pine (Pinus resinosa Ait.) plantation and in an adjacent 80—yr—old mixed hardwood stand in north—central Massachusetts. Dry matter of live fine roots was higher in the hardwoods (mean = 6.1 Mg/ha; annual range 3.6—8.6 Mg/ha) than in the plantation (mean = 5.1 Mg/ha; annual range 2.5—7.8 Mg/ha.) Dead root mass was similar in the hardwoods (mean = 4.4 Mg/ha) and the plantation (mean = 4.0 Mg/ha). Nitrogen standing crop of live roots in the hardwoods was higher than in the plantation (mean = 65 kg/ha and 42 kg/ha, respectively). Net fine root production was estimated from changes in standing crop. Production estimates ranged from 4.1 to 11.4 Mg°ha—1°yr—1 in the hardwoods and from 3.2 to 10.9 Mg°ha—1°yr—1 in the plantation, depending on the assumptions made in the calculations. Concurrent estimates of total nitrogen requirement for this production ranged from 73 to 184 kg°ha—1°yr—1 in the hardwoods and from 44 to 122 kg°ha—1°yr—1 in the plantation. Decomposition, measured as mass loss from buried cloth bags, was °20% in 0.4—mm mesh bags and as high as 47% in 3—mm mesh bags after 1 yr. Integrating production and nitrogen requirements with estimates of decomposition rates and nitrogen mineralization for these ecosystems suggested that the lower estimates of production are more accurate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes
Jackson, R. B., Canadell, J., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A., Sala, O. E., & Schulze, E. D. (1996) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00333714 · Cited by 3,071
Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems
GILL, R. A., & JACKSON, R. B. (2000) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00681.x · Cited by 1,300
Freschet, G. T., Pagès, L., Iversen, C. M., Comas, L. H., Rewald, B., Roumet, C., Klimešová, J., Zadworny, M., Poorter, H., Postma, J. A., et al. (2021) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17572 · Cited by 668
Fine Roots, Net Primary Production, and Soil Nitrogen Availability: A New Hypothesis
Nadelhoffer, K. J., Aber, J. D., & Melillo, J. M. (1985) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1939190 · Cited by 546
Self-citationResponses of tree fine roots to temperature
PREGITZER, K. S., KING, J. S., BURTON, A. J., & BROWN, S. E. (2000) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00689.x · Cited by 517
Metadata
- Authors
- McClaugherty, C. A., Aber, J. D., & Melillo, J. M.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1982-10
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1481-1490
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W1992266964
- Cited by
- 552
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Role of Fine Roots in the Organic Matter and Nitrogen Budgets of Two Forested Ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1938874
- The paper
- McClaugherty, C. A., Aber, J. D., & Melillo, J. M. (1982). The Role of Fine Roots in the Organic Matter and Nitrogen Budgets of Two Forested Ecosystems. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938874
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.