Moose Browsing and Soil Fertility in the Boreal Forests of Isle Royale National Park
Abstract
Selective foraging by moose on hardwoods and avoidance of conifers alters community composition and structure, which in turn can affect nutrient cycles and productivity. The effect of moose browsing on the nutrient cycles of boreal forests was studied using three 40—yr—old exclosures on Isle Royale, Michigan. Two alternative mechanisms by which moose affect ecosystems were tested: (1) moose depress both the quantity and quality of litter return to the soil, and hence N mineralization and net primary productivity, by browsing on hardwoods and avoiding conifers; (2) moose stimulate N mineralization, and hence net primary productivity, by opening the canopy and by dropping fecal pellets. Soil nutrient availability and microbial activity, including exchangeable cations, total carbon and nitrogen, nitrogen mineralization rates, and microbial respiration rates, were uniformly higher in exclosures than outside. These differences were more significant where browsing intensity was high and less often significant where browsing intensity was low. N mineralization in browsed plots declined with increasing moose consumption rates. Net primary production in exclosures and browsed plots was strongly correlated with N mineralization. N mineralization in turn was positively correlated with litter N return and negatively correlated with litter cellulose content. These differences in litter quantity and quality were caused by an increased abundance of unbrowsed spruce outside the exclosures. M…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Moose likely accelerated the decline of deciduous trees and the increase in spruce over the past century by preferentially consuming deciduous forage and not eating spruce.
“By preferentially consuming deciduous forage and not eating spruce, moose likely accelerated the decline of deciduous trees and the increase in spruce over the past century (e.g., Pastor et al. 1993).”
From Trophic Cascades in a Multicausal World: Isle Royale and Yellowstone (2014) · cites this paper as Pastor et al. 1993
In boreal ecosystems, moose suppress forest productivity by selectively browsing on hardwoods and releasing conifer, which decreases litter nitrogen return to soils.
“In boreal ecosystems, moose suppress forest productivity by selectively browsing on hardwoods and releasing conifer, which subsequently decreases the litter nitrogen return to the soils (Pastor et al. 1993).”
From Effects of gray wolf‐induced trophic cascades on ecosystem carbon cycling (2016) · cites this paper as Pastor et al. 1993
Cites
Forest Litter Decomposition in Relation to Soil Nitrogen Dynamics and Litter Quality
McClaugherty, C. A., Pastor, J., Aber, J. D., & Melillo, J. M. (1985) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1941327 · Cited by 593 · see citing works
Self-citationEffects of Moose Browsing on Vegetation and Litter of the Boreal Forest, Isle Royale, Michigan, USA
McInnes, P. F., Naiman, R. J., Pastor, J., & Cohen, Y. (1992) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1941455 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Original Articles: Ecological Resilience, Biodiversity, and Scale
Peterson, G., Allen, C. R., & Holling, C. S. (1998) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s100219900002 · Cited by 1,547 · see citing works
Modification of Ecosystems by Ungulates
Hobbs, N. T. (1996) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802368 · Cited by 1,016 · see citing works
Promotion of the Cycling of Diet-Enhancing Nutrients by African Grazers
McNaughton, S. J., Banyikwa, F. F., & McNaughton, M. M. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.278.5344.1798 · Cited by 597 · see citing works
Opposing plant community responses to warming with and without herbivores
Post, E., & Pedersen, C. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0802421105 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
Ecosystem consequences of wolf behavioural response to climate.
Post, E., Peterson, R. O., Stenseth, N. C., & McLaren, B. E. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/44814 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
Schmitz, O. J., Raymond, P. A., Estes, J. A., Kurz, W. A., Holtgrieve, G. W., Ritchie, M. E., Schindler, D. E., Spivak, A. C., Wilson, R. W., Bradford, M. A., et al. (2014) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-013-9715-7 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Community—And Ecosystem-Level Changes in a Species-Rich Tallgrass Prairie Restoration
Camill, P., McKone, M. J., Sturges, S. T., Severud, W. J., Ellis, E., Limmer, J., Martin, C. B., Navratil, R. T., Purdie, A. J., Sandel, B. S., et al. (2004) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/03-5273 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Trophic Cascades in a Multicausal World: Isle Royale and Yellowstone
Peterson, R. O., Vucetich, J. A., Bump, J. M., & Smith, D. W. (2014) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091634 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Forage nutritive quality in the Serengeti ecosystem: the roles of fire and herbivory.
Anderson, T. M., Ritchie, M. E., Mayemba, E., Eby, S., Grace, J. B., & McNaughton, S. J. (2007) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/520120 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
HOLDO, R. M., HOLT, R. D., COUGHENOUR, M. B., & RITCHIE, M. E. (2007) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01192.x · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Large herbivores and aquatic–terrestrial links in southern boreal forests
Bump, J. K., Tischler, K. B., Schrank, A. J., Peterson, R. O., & Vucetich, J. A. (2009) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01498.x · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Effects of gray wolf‐induced trophic cascades on ecosystem carbon cycling
Wilmers, C. C., & Schmitz, O. J. (2016) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.1501 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
“In boreal ecosystems, moose suppress forest productivity by selectively browsing on hardwoods and releasing conifer, which subsequently decreases the litter nitrogen return to the soils (Pastor et al. 1993).”
BackgroundStevenson, P. R., & Guzmán‐Caro, D. C. (2010) · American Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1002/ajp.20852 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pastor, J., Dewey, B., Naiman, R. J., McInnes, P. F., & Cohen, Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- ORCID
- Cohen, Y.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-03
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 467-480
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2133171231
- Cited by
- 530
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 17.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ecology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Ecology and biodiversity studies
- Keywords
- moose browsing, herbivory, soil nitrogen mineralization, boreal forest, litter quality, net primary productivity, exclosures, fecal pellets, canopy opening, nutrient cycling, microbial respiration, Isle Royale National Park
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review