Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 183

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparative Analyses of Carbon Dynamics in Native and Cultivated Ecosystems

Buyanovsky, G. A., Kucera, C. L., Wagner, G. H.·1987·Ecology

Abstract

Plant productivity, litter decomposition rates, and soil organic matter accumulation for winter wheat and for unbroken tallgrass prairie in Central Missouri were analyzed and compared. As measured in this 3—yr study, annual production of dry matter above— and belowground for the cultivated system averaged slightly higher than that for the natural vegetation burned every 3—4 yr. Prairie was characterized by greater year—to—year fluctuation of productivity, which in some years exceeded productivity of the cultivated system. More litter and structural biomass older than 1 yr occurred in the prairie, reflecting the perennial nature of the root system. Principal pathways of carbon transfer in both ecosystems were modeled, and mean residence time in major storage compartments estimated. Combined CO 2 losses from above— and belowground litter decay, expressed as a percentage of total soil respiration, were twice as great under wheat as for native prairie. A relatively greater fraction of net primary production was available for synthesis of soil organic matter in native prairie. Under equilibrium conditions, decomposition constants for this compartment, however, were similar. Contrasts in community structure and phenology, seasonal dynamics of litter decay, and levels of soil disturbance are suggested influences affecting transfer and storage characteristics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1939893

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 183

Metadata

Authors
Buyanovsky, G. A., Kucera, C. L., & Wagner, G. H.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1987-12
Volume
68
Issue
6
Pages
2023-2031
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2117967938
Cited by
183
References
0
FWCI
5.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative Analyses of Carbon Dynamics in Native and Cultivated Ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1939893
The paper
Buyanovsky, G. A., Kucera, C. L., & Wagner, G. H. (1987). Comparative Analyses of Carbon Dynamics in Native and Cultivated Ecosystems. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939893

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.