The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of Different Resource Additions of Species Diversity in an Annual Plant Community
Open accessAbstract
A commonly observed phenomenon in plant communities is that the addition of a limiting resource leads to an increase in productivity and a decrease in species diversity. We tested the hypothesis that the mechanism underlying this pattern is a disproportionate increase in mortality of smaller or shade—intolerant species in more productive sites caused by reduction of light levels. We added water and/or one of three nutrients (nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium) to a 1st—old—field community dominated by weedy annuals and measured effect on productivity, species composition, diversity, and light levels after one growing season. Diversity was not clearly related to productivity in this experiment. Watering increased productivity, but, contrary to expectations, had no effect on density of surviving plants, species diversity, or abundance of low—growing species. Almost all the increase in biomass with watering was due to a positive response by Ambrosia artemisiifolia, an upright annual that was the most common species in the canopy in all treatments. The addition of nitrogen had only a small positive effect on productivity, but strongly decreased density of surviving plants, species diversity, and abundance of most low—growing species. Only Ambrosia increased in abundance with nitrogen addition. The phophorus and potassium additions had little effect on the community. We suggest that the high mortality and low diversity in the nitrogen addition plots, but not in the more productive watered plots, was due to limitation by nitrogen earlier than limitation by water during the growing season. The consequence was earlier canopy closure and greater mortality due to light limitation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Harper, J. L. (1977) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 9,128
Trenbath, B., & Harper, J. L. (1978) · The Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2402622 · Cited by 6,942
Resource Competition and Community Structure.
Harper, J. L., & Tilman, D. (1983) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2259756 · Cited by 4,180
Resource Competition and Community Structure
Hassell, M. P., & Tilman, D. (1984) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4549 · Cited by 4,176
A General Hypothesis of Species Diversity
Huston, M. (1979) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283366 · Cited by 3,390
Secondary succession and the pattern of plant dominance along experimental nitrogen gradients
Tilman, D. (1987) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937080 · Cited by 1,076
Self-thinning in overcrowded pure stands under cultivated and natural conditions
Yoda, K. (1963) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 858
Size Variability and Competition in Plant Monocultures
Weiner, J., & Thomas, S. C. (1986) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3566048 · Cited by 724
Individualistic Growth Response of Tundra Plant Species to Environmental Manipulations in the Field
Chapin, F. S., & Shaver, G. R. (1985) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1940405 · Cited by 665
Occupation of Biological Space During Seedling Establishment
Ross, M. A., & Harper, J. L. (1972) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2258041 · Cited by 591
Cited by
WHAT IS THE OBSERVED RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SPECIES RICHNESS AND PRODUCTIVITY?
Mittelbach, G. G., Steiner, C. F., Scheiner, S. M., Gross, K. L., Reynolds, H. L., Waide, R. B., Willig, M. R., Dodson, S. I., & Gough, L. (2001) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2381:witorb]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,650
The Relationship Between Productivity and Species Richness
Waide, R. B., Willig, M. R., Steiner, C. F., Mittelbach, G., Gough, L., Dodson, S. I., Juday, G. P., & Parmenter, R. (1999) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.30.1.257 · Cited by 1,358
Functional- and abundance-based mechanisms explain diversity loss due to N fertilization
Suding, K. N., Collins, S. L., Gough, L., Clark, C., Cleland, E. E., Gross, K. L., Milchunas, D. G., & Pennings, S. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0408648102 · Cited by 1,053
Goldberg, D. E., & Barton, A. M. (1992) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285357 · Cited by 747
Self-citationProductivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness
Adler, P. B., Seabloom, E. W., Borer, E. T., Hillebrand, H., Hautier, Y., Hector, A., Harpole, W. S., O’Halloran, L. R., Grace, J. B., Anderson, T. M., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1204498 · Cited by 629
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldberg, D. E., & Miller, T. E.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-02
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 213-225
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W1989275374
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 8.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Different Resource Additions of Species Diversity in an Annual Plant Community. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1940261
- The paper
- Goldberg, D. E., & Miller, T. E. (1990). Effects of Different Resource Additions of Species Diversity in an Annual Plant Community. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940261
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.