Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 291

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of Different Resource Additions of Species Diversity in an Annual Plant Community

Open access
Goldberg, Deborah E., Miller, Thomas E.·1990·Ecology

Abstract

A commonly observed phenomenon in plant communities is that the addition of a limiting resource leads to an increase in productivity and a decrease in species diversity. We tested the hypothesis that the mechanism underlying this pattern is a disproportionate increase in mortality of smaller or shade—intolerant species in more productive sites caused by reduction of light levels. We added water and/or one of three nutrients (nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium) to a 1st—old—field community dominated by weedy annuals and measured effect on productivity, species composition, diversity, and light levels after one growing season. Diversity was not clearly related to productivity in this experiment. Watering increased productivity, but, contrary to expectations, had no effect on density of surviving plants, species diversity, or abundance of low—growing species. Almost all the increase in biomass with watering was due to a positive response by Ambrosia artemisiifolia, an upright annual that was the most common species in the canopy in all treatments. The addition of nitrogen had only a small positive effect on productivity, but strongly decreased density of surviving plants, species diversity, and abundance of most low—growing species. Only Ambrosia increased in abundance with nitrogen addition. The phophorus and potassium additions had little effect on the community. We suggest that the high mortality and low diversity in the nitrogen addition plots, but not in the more productive watered plots, was due to limitation by nitrogen earlier than limitation by water during the growing season. The consequence was earlier canopy closure and greater mortality due to light limitation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1940261

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 291

Metadata

Authors
Goldberg, D. E., & Miller, T. E.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1990-02
Volume
71
Issue
1
Pages
213-225
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W1989275374
Cited by
291
References
29
FWCI
8.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Different Resource Additions of Species Diversity in an Annual Plant Community. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1940261
The paper
Goldberg, D. E., & Miller, T. E. (1990). Effects of Different Resource Additions of Species Diversity in an Annual Plant Community. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940261

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.