The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gap‐Phase Regeneration in a Tropical Forest
Abstract
Gap—phase regeneration of trees was described for the first 5—6 yr of regrowth in 30 treefall gaps (20—705 m 2) in tropical moist forest on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Trees were classified as pioneers (saplings found only in gaps) or primary species (saplings found in gaps and in the understory of mature forest). In most of the gaps studied, stem densities rose rapidly after gap formation, then levelled off or declined by years 3—6. This pattern was particularly marked in some large gaps (>150 m 2), where pioneers attained high densities, then experienced heavy mortality. Stem density of primary species did not vary with gap size. In large gaps the mean rate of growth in height was greater for pioneers than for primary species, size—class distribution broadened more for pioneers than for primary species, and early recruits of both regeneration types grew faster than later ones. Gap formation fosters regeneration of pioneer and primary species and, in this forest, produces patches that differ markedly in tree population dynamics, species composition, and growth rate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ecosystem Decay of Amazonian Forest Fragments: a 22‐Year Investigation
Laurance, W. F., Lovejoy, T. E., Vasconcelos, H. L., Bruna, E. M., Didham, R. K., Stouffer, P. C., Gascon, C., Bierregaard, R. O., Laurance, S. G., & Sampaio, E. (2002) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01025.x · Cited by 1,847
Light-Gap Disturbances, Recruitment Limitation, and Tree Diversity in a Neotropical Forest
Hubbell, S. P., Foster, R. B., O'Brien, S. T., Harms, K. E., Condit, R., Wechsler, B., Wright, S. J., & de Lao, S. L. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.283.5401.554 · Cited by 1,537
Alternative successional pathways in the Amazon Basin
Mesquita, R. C. G., Ickes, K., Ganade, G., & Williamson, G. B. (2001) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2001.00583.x · Cited by 361
Forest Gap Dynamics and Tree Regeneration
Yamamoto, S.-I. (2000) · Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1007/bf02767114 · Cited by 331
The ecology and management of non-timber forest resources
Peters, C. M. (1996) · World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks · doi:10.1596/0-8213-3619-3 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Brokaw, N. V. L.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1985-06
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 682-687
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2035389732
- Cited by
- 818
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gap‐Phase Regeneration in a Tropical Forest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1940529
- The paper
- Brokaw, N. V. L. (1985). Gap‐Phase Regeneration in a Tropical Forest. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940529
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.