The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fine Root Production Estimates and Belowground Carbon Allocation in Forest Ecosystems
Abstract
We compared published estimates of the net fine root production (FRP) in forest sites to litterfall and aboveground net primary production (ANPP) to test whether annual rates of fine root and aboveground production vary together at global scales. We also compared FRP estimates to theoretical upper limits as defined by our previously published relationship between total root allocation (TRA, carbon allocated to FRP plus live—root respiration) and litterfall. Estimates of the carbon content of FRP in the total data set ranged from 25 to 820 g°m—2°yr—1 and were not correlated with annual litterfall of ANPP. Different methods used for estimating fine root production, however, showed contrasting results. Estimates derived using either sums of seasonal changes in fine root biomass ("Sequential Core" method) or differences between annual maximum and minimum fine root biomass ("Maximum — Minimum" method) were not correlated with either litterfall of ANPP. Sequential Core estimates were often high relative to predicted TRA values, whereas Maximum — Minimum estimates were generally <50% of TRA. The small number of FRP estimates derived from root—free cores ("Ingrowth Core" method) were not correlated with measures of aboveground production but were all well below predicted TRA values. In contrast to results of other methods, FRP estimates derived using ecosystem N budgets ("N Budget" method) were positively correlated with both litterfall and ANPP. Comparing FRP estimates based on N budgets with previous results of forest soil C budgets suggested that annual fine root production increases with aboveground production and that °1/3 of TRA is used for production of fine roots.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems
GILL, R. A., & JACKSON, R. B. (2000) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00681.x · Cited by 1,300
Freschet, G. T., Pagès, L., Iversen, C. M., Comas, L. H., Rewald, B., Roumet, C., Klimešová, J., Zadworny, M., Poorter, H., Postma, J. A., et al. (2021) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17572 · Cited by 668
The potential of willow and poplar plantations as carbon sinks in Sweden
Rytter, R.-M. (2012) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.10.012 · Cited by 105
Rytter, R.-M. (2001) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(00)00319-4 · Cited by 94
Rytter, R.-M., & Hansson, A.-C. (1996) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/0961-9534(96)00023-2 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Nadelhoffer, K. J., & Raich, J. W.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-08
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1139-1147
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W1978418134
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fine Root Production Estimates and Belowground Carbon Allocation in Forest Ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1940664
- The paper
- Nadelhoffer, K. J., & Raich, J. W. (1992). Fine Root Production Estimates and Belowground Carbon Allocation in Forest Ecosystems. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940664
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.