The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sun, Slope, and Butterflies: Topographic Determinants of Habitat Quality for Euphydryas Editha
Abstract
Thermal environments in a large, topographically diverse serpentine soil—based grassland were quantified and ranked using a computer model of clear sky insolation and shading on different slopes to determine the effects of microclimate on the rates of development of each of the life stages of the butterfly Euphydryas editha bayensis. Larvae developed to pupation earlier on warm slopes than on progressively cooler slopes. Availability of sunlight can be limiting for larvae, which bask indirect sun to raise body temperature. Larvae can disperse >10 m/d, allowing them to transfer between microclimates. Pupae on warmer slopes also developed faster than those on cooler slopes. Microclimate also affects the phenology of host plants of larvae and nectar sources of adults. Larval and pupal development and host—plant phenology determine the phase relationship between adult butterfly flight and host—plant senescence, which in turn determines mortality rates of prediapause larvae. Adult females that eclosed early in the season could have their offspring survive on almost all slopes, survivorship of offspring from adults that eclosed in the middle of the flight season was restricted to cooler slopes in the habitat. Some butterflies eclosed too late for their offspring to survive on any slope. Topographic diversity on several scales is a prime indicator of habitat quality for this butterfly. Areas of high local topographic diversity on a scale of tens of metres appear particularly important for long—term population persistence under variable climatic conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ecological and Evolutionary Responses to Recent Climate Change
Parmesan, C. (2006) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110100 · Cited by 8,652
Climate Extremes: Observations, Modeling, and Impacts
Easterling, D. R., Meehl, G. A., Parmesan, C., Changnon, S. A., Karl, T. R., & Mearns, L. O. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.289.5487.2068 · Cited by 4,867
Hanski, I. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/23876 · Cited by 2,779
PARMESAN, C. (2007) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01404.x · Cited by 1,357
Ecological Consequences of Recent Climate Change
McCarty, J. P. (2001) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015002320.x · Cited by 1,084
Metadata
- Authors
- Weiss, S. B., Murphy, D. D., & White, R. R.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-10
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1486-1496
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2064332131
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sun, Slope, and Butterflies: Topographic Determinants of Habitat Quality for Euphydryas Editha. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1941646
- The paper
- Weiss, S. B., Murphy, D. D., & White, R. R. (1988). Sun, Slope, and Butterflies: Topographic Determinants of Habitat Quality for Euphydryas Editha. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941646
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.