The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating Approaches to the Conservation of Rare and Endangered Plants
Abstract
Nearly 25% of the estimated 250,000 species of vascular plants in the world may become extinct within the next 50 yr (Raven 1987), and 22% of vascular plant species in the United States are currently of conservation concern (Falk 1992). Plant conservation efforts received a critical boost with the passage of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 USC 1531-1544: USFWS 1988a). The Act established a legal mandate of unprecedented proportions to promote the collection, analysis, and exchange of biological information. It requires that for each endangered or threatened species occurring in the United States, a recovery plan be developed which "delineates, justifies, and schedules the research and management actions necessary to support the recovery of a species" (16 USC, 1531-1544: USFWS 1988a).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Harper, J. L. (1977) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 9,128
THE BOTTLENECK EFFECT AND GENETIC VARIABILITY IN POPULATIONS
Nei, M., Maruyama, T., & Chakraborty, R. (1975) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1975.tb00807.x · Cited by 3,498
On the Relationship between Abundance and Distribution of Species
Brown, J. H. (1984) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284267 · Cited by 3,276
INBREEDING DEPRESSION AND ITS EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES
Charlesworth, D., & Charlesworth, B. (1987) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.18.110187.001321 · Cited by 3,258
Minimum Population Sizes for Species Conservation
Shaffer, M. L. (1981) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1308256 · Cited by 2,014
Translocation as a Species Conservation Tool: Status and Strategy
Griffith, B., Scott, J. M., Carpenter, J. W., & Reed, C. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.245.4917.477 · Cited by 1,912
MOLECULAR POPULATION GENETICS AND EVOLUTION
Wills, C. (1976) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1976.tb00902.x · Cited by 1,729
Hedrick, P. W. (1983) · Cited by 1,580
Jain, S. K. (1982) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1982.tb05062.x · Cited by 1,469
Boyce, M. S. (1992) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.23.110192.002405 · Cited by 1,242
Cited by
Quantifying Threats to Imperiled Species in the United States
Wilcove, D. S., Rothstein, D., Dubow, J., Phillips, A., & Losos, E. (1998) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1313420 · Cited by 3,097
Adaptive population divergence: markers, QTL and traits
McKay, J. K., & Latta, R. G. (2002) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(02)02478-3 · Cited by 829
Lande, R. (1995) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09040782.x · Cited by 686
ELASTICITIES: A REVIEW OF METHODS AND MODEL LIMITATIONS
de Kroon, H., van Groenendael, J., & Ehrlén, J. (2000) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[0607:earoma]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 632
Emerging Issues in Population Viability Analysis
Reed, J. M., Mills, L. S., Dunning, J. B., Menges, E. S., McKelvey, K. S., Frye, R., Beissinger, S. R., Anstett, M., & Miller, P. (2002) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.99419.x · Cited by 462
Metadata
- Authors
- Schemske, D. W., Husband, B. C., Ruckelshaus, M. H., Goodwillie, C., Parker, I. M., & Bishop, J. G.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-04
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 584-606
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2322963485
- Cited by
- 1,071
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 30.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluating Approaches to the Conservation of Rare and Endangered Plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1941718
- The paper
- Schemske, D. W., Husband, B. C., Ruckelshaus, M. H., Goodwillie, C., Parker, I. M., & Bishop, J. G. (1994). Evaluating Approaches to the Conservation of Rare and Endangered Plants. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941718
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
