The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Old‐Growth Pseudotsuga menziesii Communities of a Western Oregon Watershed: Biomass Distribution and Production Budgets
Abstract
Living biomass, organic matter distribution, and organic matter production budgets were determined for plant communities of a small watershed dominated by 450—yr—old Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco forests. Dominant trees in the communities were large, up to 175 cm diam and 80 m tall. Aboveground tree biomass of the various communities ranged from 491.8—975.8 tonnes/hectare, total aboveground living biomass ranged from 500.4—982.5 t/ha, total leaf biomass ranged from 10.4—16.3 t/ha and total organic matter accumulations ranged from 1,008.3—1,513.7 t/ha. Total tree biomass in the various communities was more related to past mortality than habitat differences. Biomass of standing dead trees and fallen logs was generally inversely related to aboveground tree biomass. Amounts of woody detritus were large, ranging from 59.0—650.6 t/ha or 4.3%—43.0% of total community organic accumulation. Aboveground tree biomass increment was negative in all communities, ranging from —2.9 to —6.2 t/ha. Positive increment by shrubs and trees <15 cm dbh, produced overall aboveground biomass increment —2.5 to —5.0 t/ha. Mortality averaged 1% of standing biomass. Aboveground net primary production in the various communities ranged from 6.3 to 10.1 t°ha—1°—1 and was roughly proportional to standing biomass. Net primary production consisted entirely of detritus. Total community autotrophic respiration ranged from 102.9—203.7 t°ha—1°yr—1 of which °70% was by foliage. Gross primary production ranged from 111.2—216.8 t°ha—1°yr—1 of which only 6.0%—7.9% was net primary production. Net ecosystem production ranged from 0.12—5.6 t°ha—1°yr—1, entirely as an accumulation of woody detritus on the soil surface. Available evidence indicates larger peak biomass in seral P. menziesii than in climax Tsuga heterophylla forests. These communities may be in the process of declining from seral peak to steady—state climax biomass.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes
Jackson, R. B., Canadell, J., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A., Sala, O. E., & Schulze, E. D. (1996) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00333714 · Cited by 3,071
Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems
GILL, R. A., & JACKSON, R. B. (2000) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00681.x · Cited by 1,300
Effects on Carbon Storage of Conversion of Old-Growth Forests to Young Forests
Harmon, M. E., Ferrell, W. K., & Franklin, J. F. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.247.4943.699 · Cited by 819
Means, J. (1999) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(98)00091-1 · Cited by 503
Organic C and N stabilization in a forest soil: Evidence from sequential density fractionation
Sollins, P., Swanston, C., Kleber, M., Filley, T., Kramer, M., Crow, S., Caldwell, B. A., Lajtha, K., & Bowden, R. (2006) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.04.014 · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- Grier, C. C., & Logan, R. S.
- Venue
- Ecological Monographs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1977-09
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 373-400
- ISSN
- 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7015
- OpenAlex
- W2015663015
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Old‐Growth Pseudotsuga menziesii Communities of a Western Oregon Watershed: Biomass Distribution and Production Budgets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1942174
- The paper
- Grier, C. C., & Logan, R. S. (1977). Old‐Growth Pseudotsuga menziesii Communities of a Western Oregon Watershed: Biomass Distribution and Production Budgets. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942174
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.