Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 308

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Old‐Growth Pseudotsuga menziesii Communities of a Western Oregon Watershed: Biomass Distribution and Production Budgets

Grier, Charles C., Logan, Robert S.·1977·Ecological Monographs

Abstract

Living biomass, organic matter distribution, and organic matter production budgets were determined for plant communities of a small watershed dominated by 450—yr—old Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco forests. Dominant trees in the communities were large, up to 175 cm diam and 80 m tall. Aboveground tree biomass of the various communities ranged from 491.8—975.8 tonnes/hectare, total aboveground living biomass ranged from 500.4—982.5 t/ha, total leaf biomass ranged from 10.4—16.3 t/ha and total organic matter accumulations ranged from 1,008.3—1,513.7 t/ha. Total tree biomass in the various communities was more related to past mortality than habitat differences. Biomass of standing dead trees and fallen logs was generally inversely related to aboveground tree biomass. Amounts of woody detritus were large, ranging from 59.0—650.6 t/ha or 4.3%—43.0% of total community organic accumulation. Aboveground tree biomass increment was negative in all communities, ranging from —2.9 to —6.2 t/ha. Positive increment by shrubs and trees <15 cm dbh, produced overall aboveground biomass increment —2.5 to —5.0 t/ha. Mortality averaged 1% of standing biomass. Aboveground net primary production in the various communities ranged from 6.3 to 10.1 t°ha—1°—1 and was roughly proportional to standing biomass. Net primary production consisted entirely of detritus. Total community autotrophic respiration ranged from 102.9—203.7 t°ha—1°yr—1 of which °70% was by foliage. Gross primary production ranged from 111.2—216.8 t°ha—1°yr—1 of which only 6.0%—7.9% was net primary production. Net ecosystem production ranged from 0.12—5.6 t°ha—1°yr—1, entirely as an accumulation of woody detritus on the soil surface. Available evidence indicates larger peak biomass in seral P. menziesii than in climax Tsuga heterophylla forests. These communities may be in the process of declining from seral peak to steady—state climax biomass.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1942174

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 308

Metadata

Authors
Grier, C. C., & Logan, R. S.
Venue
Ecological Monographs
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1977-09
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
373-400
ISSN
  • 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7015
OpenAlex
W2015663015
Cited by
308
References
0
FWCI
9.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Old‐Growth Pseudotsuga menziesii Communities of a Western Oregon Watershed: Biomass Distribution and Production Budgets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1942174
The paper
Grier, C. C., & Logan, R. S. (1977). Old‐Growth Pseudotsuga menziesii Communities of a Western Oregon Watershed: Biomass Distribution and Production Budgets. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942174

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.