Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 167

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Organic Matter and Nutrient Dynamics in Forest Floors of Young and Mature Abies amabilis Stands in Western Washington, as Affected by Fine‐Root Input

Vogt, Kristiina A., Grier, Charles C., Meier, Calvin E., Keyes, Michael R.·1983·Ecological Monographs

Abstract

Seasonal patterns of decomposition and nutrient release from the major litterfall components were determined using litterbags in young (23—yr—old) and mature (180—yr—old) Abies amabilis stands in western Washington, USA. The time required for each litterfall component to decompose completely was estimated in both stands. Long—term organic matter and nutrient residence times in the forest floor were estimated using forest floor and aboveground litterfall masses. In addition, the effect of root turnover in the forest floor on estimates of organic matter and nutrient residence time was determined. Similar litter substrates lost mass at a significantly faster rate in the young than in the mature stand. An initial rapid mass loss (9—67%) for litter substrates during the winter months coincided with increased immobilization of nitrogen and calcium and mineralization of phosphorus, potassium, and magnesium. However, herb species and epiphytic lichen decomposition in both stands showed no immobilization of N, P, K, Ca, or Mg or increased mass in litterbags at all sampling dates. The remaining litter substrates showed no loss or gain in mass during summer and autumn, with continued immobilization of N and P, while K, Ca, and Mg levels remained the same or decreased. From 36 to 77% of the total 2—yr mass loss of all litter substrates occurred during the initial 4 mo. The various litter components required °6—15 and 2—24 yr for 99% decomposition to occur in the young and mature stands, respectively. The addition of roots into the estimation of organic matter residence time (MRT) in the forest floor reduced the estimate by °75% in both stands. The predicted turnover time of 1 yr's litterfall (11—12 yr) was very similar to the estimated residence time of total forest floor when roots were included in the calculations. The inclusion of roots in the estimation of forest floor MRT decreased the nutrient residence time for N by 74%, for P by 75%—86%, for K by 81—90%, for Ca by 52—55%, and for Mg by 66—85% in both stands. Addition of root nutrient input into estimates of forest floor nutrient MRT increased the annual turnover of forest floor nutrients from 1—2% to 4—16% in the young stand and from 1—4% to 4—8% in the mature stand. The element mobility series resulting from litterbag studies did not give the same pattern of mobility as obtained from the total forest floor with or without root input.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1942492

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 167

Metadata

Authors
Vogt, K. A., Grier, C. C., Meier, C. E., & Keyes, M. R.
Venue
Ecological Monographs
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1983-06
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
139-157
ISSN
  • 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7015
OpenAlex
W2135584732
Cited by
167
References
1
FWCI
13.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organic Matter and Nutrient Dynamics in Forest Floors of Young and Mature Abies amabilis Stands in Western Washington, as Affected by Fine‐Root Input. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1942492
The paper
Vogt, K. A., Grier, C. C., Meier, C. E., & Keyes, M. R. (1983). Organic Matter and Nutrient Dynamics in Forest Floors of Young and Mature Abies amabilis Stands in Western Washington, as Affected by Fine‐Root Input. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942492

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.