The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing the patterns and controls of fine root dynamics: an empirical test and methodological review
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Elucidation of the patterns and controls of forest net primary production at ecosystem scales has been hindered by a poor understanding of fine root production, due largely to technical limitations. Fine root (≤ 0.5 mm diameter) production was assessed using minirhizotron, soil core, ingrowth core, nitrogen budget and carbon budget techniques in three longleaf pine‐wiregrass forest ecosystem types (hydric, mesic and xeric) forming an edaphic resource availability and above‐ground productivity gradient. Fine root production estimates differed substantially in magnitude, e.g. values ranged from 0 to 4618 kg ha−1 year−1 for the soil core and minirhizotron techniques, respectively, in the hydric site. Minirhizotron production estimates in the hydric, mesic and xeric sites were 4618, 1905 and 2295 kg ha−1 year−1, respectively. Soil core and ingrowth core root production estimates were on average 81 and 54% lower, respectively, than corresponding minirhizotron production estimates, and minirhizotron estimates were negatively related to soil core and ingrowth core estimates across the resource gradient. The N budget method yielded unreliable root production estimates, presumably due to the underestimation of N availability for plant assimilation. C budget estimates of total below‐ground C allocation (6773, 5646 and 4647 kg C ha−1 year−1) were positively related to minirhizotron production estimates, but negatively related to soil core and ingrowth core production estimates. Critical evaluations of the assumptions, potential errors and results for each method suggest that the minirhizotron technique yielded the most reliable root production estimates, and that the negative relationship between minirhizotron and core‐based estimates may be attributed to the inherent deficiency of the core techniques in assessing root production when mortality and production occur simultaneously. Minirhizotron root production estimates were positively related to foliage production estimates, supporting the hypothesis of constant proportional allocation of production to foliage, wood and fine roots across resource availability gradients in temperate forests. These results suggest that fine root production is not negatively correlated with soil resource availability and foliage production as is commonly perceived in the ecological community and represented in ecosystem computer models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Littell, R. C. (1996) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,341
Nitrogen mineralization: Challenges of a changing paradigm
Schimel, J. P., & Bennett, J. (2004) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/03-8002 · Cited by 2,511
FINE ROOT ARCHITECTURE OF NINE NORTH AMERICAN TREES
Pregitzer, K. S., DeForest, J. L., Burton, A. J., Allen, M. F., Ruess, R. W., & Hendrick, R. L. (2002) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/0012-9615(2002)072[0293:fraonn]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,065
Self-citationBelowground Carbon Allocation in Forest Ecosystems: Global Trends
Raich, J. W., & Nadelhoffer, K. J. (1989) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1938194 · Cited by 796
Nice, M. M., & Smith, R. L. (1966) · Bird-Banding · doi:10.2307/4511325 · Cited by 643
The Role of Fine Roots in the Organic Matter and Nitrogen Budgets of Two Forested Ecosystems
McClaugherty, C. A., Aber, J. D., & Melillo, J. M. (1982) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1938874 · Cited by 552
Fine Roots, Net Primary Production, and Soil Nitrogen Availability: A New Hypothesis
Nadelhoffer, K. J., Aber, J. D., & Melillo, J. M. (1985) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1939190 · Cited by 546
Keyes, M. R., & Grier, C. C. (1981) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/x81-082 · Cited by 531
Ecology: Concepts and Applications
Molles, M. C. (2001) · NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) · Cited by 520
Fine Root Production Estimates and Belowground Carbon Allocation in Forest Ecosystems
Nadelhoffer, K. J., & Raich, J. W. (1992) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1940664 · Cited by 478
Cited by
Freschet, G. T., Pagès, L., Iversen, C. M., Comas, L. H., Rewald, B., Roumet, C., Klimešová, J., Zadworny, M., Poorter, H., Postma, J. A., et al. (2021) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17572 · Cited by 668
Above- and below-ground net primary productivity across ten Amazonian forests on contrasting soils
Aragão, L. E. O. C., Malhi, Y., Metcalfe, D. B., Silva-Espejo, J. E., Jiménez, E., Navarrete, D., Almeida, S., Costa, A. C. L., Salinas, N., Phillips, O. L., et al. (2009) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-6-2759-2009 · Cited by 339
Rytter, R.-M. (2013) · Tree Physiology · doi:10.1093/treephys/tpt060 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- HENDRICKS, J. J., HENDRICK, R. L., WILSON, C. A., MITCHELL, R. J., PECOT, S. D., & GUO, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-10-31
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 40-57
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2745
- OpenAlex
- W2170909324
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 70
- FWCI
- 30.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing the patterns and controls of fine root dynamics: an empirical test and methodological review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01067.x
- The paper
- HENDRICKS, J. J., HENDRICK, R. L., WILSON, C. A., MITCHELL, R. J., PECOT, S. D., & GUO, D. (2006). Assessing the patterns and controls of fine root dynamics: an empirical test and methodological review. Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01067.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.