The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fire and Other Factors Controlling the Big Woods Vegetation of Minnesota in the Mid‐Nineteenth Century
Abstract
Bearing—tree data from the original land—survey records of 1847—1850 were used to reconstruct the vegetation of the Big Woods and adjacent areas along the prairie—woodland border in south—central Minnesota. The characteristic tree taxa of the Big Woods were elm (Ulmus), basswood (Tilia americana), sugar maple (Acer saccharum), ironwood (Ostrya virginiana), bitternut hickory (Carya cordiformis), butternut (Junglans cinerea), and ash (Fraxinus). The most common tree was elm, which comprised 27% of the bearing trees. A buffer zone of fire—tolerant oaks and aspen generally lay between the Big Woods and prairie. The width of this zone depended on topography and on the presence of additional firebreaks, which in places formed sharp boundaries between the Big Woods and oak—aspen. The prairie—woodland border was characteristically a sharp boundary along firebreaks (water bodies and physiographic breaks). In some places very effective firebreaks formed sharp boundaries between prairie and the Big Woods, with no intervening oak—aspen zone. The vegetation was most strongly correlated with the fire—probability pattern, which was a function of both abiotic and biotic factors. Soils influenced the probability of fire, but they also were the major factor controlling the vegetation within areas of similar fire probability. Soil drainage was the most important factor controlling vegetation within the units of the overall pattern. Because the locations of firebreaks and the existing pattern of vegetation controlled the fire probability pattern, sites with virtually identical physical characteristics supported qualitatively different types of persistent or stable vegetation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bowman, D. M. J. S., Balch, J. K., Artaxo, P., Bond, W. J., Carlson, J. M., Cochrane, M. A., D’Antonio, C. M., DeFries, R. S., Doyle, J. C., Harrison, S. P., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1163886 · Cited by 3,351
Thonicke, K., Venevsky, S., Sitch, S., & Cramer, W. (2001) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1046/j.1466-822x.2001.00175.x · Cited by 684
Foster, D. R., Motzkin, G., & Slater, B. (1998) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s100219900008 · Cited by 662
Woodland Expansions in the Platte River, Nebraska: Patterns and Causes
Johnson, W. C. (1994) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937055 · Cited by 549
Landscape Patterns and Legacies Resulting from Large, Infrequent Forest Disturbances
Foster, D. R., Knight, D. H., & Franklin, J. F. (1998) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s100219900046 · Cited by 485
Metadata
- Authors
- Grimm, E. C.
- Venue
- Ecological Monographs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1984-09
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 291-311
- ISSN
- 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7015
- OpenAlex
- W1980391459
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fire and Other Factors Controlling the Big Woods Vegetation of Minnesota in the Mid‐Nineteenth Century. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1942499
- The paper
- Grimm, E. C. (1984). Fire and Other Factors Controlling the Big Woods Vegetation of Minnesota in the Mid‐Nineteenth Century. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942499
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.