Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,162

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Epizootiology and Ecological Significance of Malaria in Hawaiian Land Birds

Open access
van Riper, Charles, van Riper, Sandra G., Goff, M. Lee, Laird, Marshall·1986·Ecological Monographs

Abstract

Laboratory and field experiments were conducted on the island of Hawaii from 1977—1980 in an effort to determine the impact of avian malaria on the forest birds. At 16 study sites from sea level to tree line in mesic and xeric habitat, birds were captured and bled to determine the host and altitudinal distribution of blood parasites. In the laboratory, six bird species were challenged with malarial parasites to measure host susceptibility. Distributions, activity cycles, and transmission potentials of malarial parasite vectors were also analyzed. One species of Plasmodium was present from sea level to tree line, concentrated in the mid—elevational ranges in the ecotonal area where vectors and native birds had the greatest overlap. Native forest birds were: (a) more susceptible to malaria than were introduced species; (b) most likely to have malaria during the nonbreeding, wet season; (c) found ranging lower in xeric than in mesic forests; and (d) found to have a lower prevalence of malaria in xeric forests. Temporal as well as elevational differences in prevalence and parasitemia levels of wild birds were apparent throughout the annual cycle, a result of differing host and parasite responses to biotic and abiotic factors. Avian malaria probably did not reach epizootic proportions on Hawaii until after ≈1920. However, since that time it has had a negative impact on the population dynamics of the native forest birds and is today a major limiting factor, restricting both abundance and distribution of these species on the island. In response, a number of native bird species have developed immunogenetic and behavioral responses that reduce the impact of the parasite on host populations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1942550

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 1,162

Metadata

Authors
van Riper, C., van Riper, S. G., Goff, M. L., & Laird, M.
Venue
Ecological Monographs
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1986-12
Volume
56
Issue
4
Pages
327-344
ISSN
  • 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7015
OpenAlex
W2090445407
Cited by
1,162
References
13
FWCI
5.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Epizootiology and Ecological Significance of Malaria in Hawaiian Land Birds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1942550
The paper
van Riper, C., van Riper, S. G., Goff, M. L., & Laird, M. (1986). The Epizootiology and Ecological Significance of Malaria in Hawaiian Land Birds. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942550

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.