The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dimensions of Political Alienation
Abstract
In recent years there has emerged in this country a radical questioning and rejection of established political institutions unparalleled since the Civil War in its intensity and scope. One objective indicator of this trend since World War II is the marked rise in voluntary renunciation of American citizenship, an act which represents the formal and final estrangement of the individual from his former political ties. Available evidence suggests that estrangement from the polity is also widespread in countries throughout the world as fundamental questions are being raised about the legitimacy of political institutions and political leadership. Attitudes toward the political system have long been a concern of political scientists. Major orienting theories of the political system suggest that citizen support plays a crucial role in determining the structure and processes of political systems. Almond and Verba, for example, use the concept “civic culture” to refer to a complex mix of attitudes and behaviors considered to be conducive to democratic government. Easton underscores the fundamental importance of attitudes for system stability, focusing especially on “diffuse support” as a prerequisite for the integration of political systems. He suggests that “(w)here the input of support falls below [a certain] minimum, the persistence of any kind of system will be endangered. A system will finally succumb unless it adopts measures to cope with the stress.” The conversion of these general theoretical ideas into systematic empirical theory requires further rigorous and comprehensive analyses of types of citizen support and the development of empirical indicators for this domain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations
Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400874569 · Cited by 5,936
Eulau, H. (1960) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s000305540012235x · Cited by 4,722
Social Theory and Social Structure.
Stone, G. P., & Merton, R. K. (1958) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2390803 · Cited by 4,499
A Systems Analysis of Political Life
Albrow, M. C., & Easton, D. (1966) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/589063 · Cited by 3,333
Andersen, E. B., & Harman, H. H. (1968) · Revue de l'Institut International de Statistique / Review of the International Statistical Institute · doi:10.2307/1401485 · Cited by 3,177
(1965) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,109
BMD : biomedical computer programs
Dixon, W. J. (1965) · University of California Press eBooks · Cited by 2,673
The functions of social conflict
Coser, L. A. (1956) · Cited by 2,648
Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963) · Cited by 2,647
The Functions of Social Conflict.
Levy, M. J., & Coser, L. A. (1957) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2088776 · Cited by 2,596
Cited by
Political Trust and Trustworthiness
Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.475 · Cited by 2,190
Balmas, M. (2014) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650212453600 · Cited by 325
Metadata
- Authors
- Finifter, A. W.
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1970-06
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 389-410
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W2324353375
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 48.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dimensions of Political Alienation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1953840
- The paper
- Finifter, A. W. (1970). Dimensions of Political Alienation. American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/1953840
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.