The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Issues and Party Support in Multiparty Systems
Abstract
We investigate the relationship between party issue position and mass evaluation of political parties in multiparty systems. In so doing, we engage two competing theories of mass-elite linkage: the directional theory and the traditional spatial theory of elections. The alternate models are evaluated with survey data gathered in Norway in 1989. The data collection is unique in providing extensive information on the issue positions of all parties with potential for achieving representation in the parliament. Results suggest that the directional theory provides a better description of the relationship. Consistent with directional theory, we find that when parties occupy a centrist position on an issue they are not evaluated on the basis of that issue. Voters neither love nor hate a party in the middle. Thus, in order to build support on the basis of issues, parties must offer some strong stands.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108595841 · Cited by 2,986
Expert Interpretations of Party Space and Party Locations in 42 Societies
Huber, J., & Inglehart, R. (1995) · Party Politics · doi:10.1177/1354068895001001004 · Cited by 1,161
When Moderate Voters Prefer Extreme Parties: Policy Balancingin Parliamentary Elections
KEDAR, O. (2005) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055405051592 · Cited by 389
European Integration and Political Conflict
(2004) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511492013 · Cited by 297
Charisma, Leader Effects and Support for Right-Wing Populist Parties
van der Brug, W., & Mughan, A. (2007) · Party Politics · doi:10.1177/1354068806071260 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Macdonald, S. E., Listhaug, O., & Rabinowitz, G.
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1991-12
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1107-1131
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W2022146198
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Issues and Party Support in Multiparty Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1963938
- The paper
- Macdonald, S. E., Listhaug, O., & Rabinowitz, G. (1991). Issues and Party Support in Multiparty Systems. American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/1963938
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.