Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 703

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

MULTINATIONAL COMPANIES AND THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT: DETERMINANTS OF GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY STANDARDIZATION.

Christmann, P.·2004·Academy of Management Journal

Abstract

The environmental conduct of multinational companies (MNCs) is very controversial. On the one hand, it has been argued that MNCs exploit cross-country differences in environmental regula tions by locating dirty operations in countries with lax environmental regulations and by adapting their subsidiaries' environmental policies, technol ogies, and standards to local country conditions (Gladwin, 1987; K?rten, 1995; Vernon, 1998). On the other hand, it has been suggested that MNCs increasingly self-regulate their environmental con duct (Christmann & Taylor, 2001; Rappaport & Fla herty, 1992; United Nations, 1993). Self-regulation refers to a firm's adoption of environmental poli cies or performance standards that exceed the re quirements of government regulations. MNCs can self-regulate their environmental conduct by stan dardizing their environmental policies worldwide, thus reducing their ability to exploit cross-country differences in environmental regulations. Although evidence from the 1970s and 1980s supports the adaptation of MNCs' environmental policies and standards to local conditions (Gladwin, 1987; United Nations, 1988), more recent evidence sug gests that MNCs are increasingly implementing more globally uniform environmental policies (Brown, Derr, Renn, & White, 1993; Dowell, Hart, & Yeung, 2000; Rappaport & Flaherty, 1992). How ever, little is known about the factors that cause MNCs to standardize their environmental polices on a global basis, and more research is needed to address this question (Dowell et al., 2000). In this paper, I identify determinants of MNCs' global en vironmental policy standardization and empiri cally analyze their importance. To address this issue, I drew on the international management and environmental management liter atures. The international management literature suggests that MNCs can implement strategies that range from nationally responsive and adapted to country markets to globally integrated and stan dardized (Bartlett & Ghoshal, 1989; Prahalad & Doz, 1987; Yip, 1992). Empirical studies have analyzed determinants of global standardization for MNCs' overall strategies as well as for different functional strategies (Hannon, Huang, & Jaw, 1995; Johansson & Yip, 1994; Kobrin, 1991; Laroche, Kirpalani, Pons, & Zhou, 2001). In the environmental manage ment literature, studies have examined determi nants of firms' environmental conduct in single country settings (Arag?n-Correa, 1998; Arora & Cason, 1995; Christmann & Taylor, 2001; Hen riques & Sadorsky, 1996; Sharma, 2000). Both ex ternal stakeholders and internal firm characteris tics have been identified as determinants of firms'

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/20159616

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 703

Metadata

Authors
Christmann, P.
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Published
2004-10-01
Volume
47
Issue
5
Pages
747-760
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
OpenAlex
W2298266233
Cited by
703
References
3
FWCI
50.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MULTINATIONAL COMPANIES AND THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT: DETERMINANTS OF GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY STANDARDIZATION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/20159616
The paper
Christmann, P. (2004). MULTINATIONAL COMPANIES AND THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT: DETERMINANTS OF GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY STANDARDIZATION. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159616

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.