The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intentional Systems
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It is well-received in both the philosophical and the computer science literature that knowledge of such higher-level regularities does not presuppose knowledge of the finer details of the system”
From AI, Opacity, and Personal Autonomy (2022) · cites this paper as Dennett, 1971
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 991
Understanding Social Robots: Attribution of Intentional Agency to Artificial and Biological Bodies
Tom Ziemke, B. (2023) · Artificial Life · doi:10.1162/artl_a_00404 · Cited by 30
Realism, generality, or testability: The ecological modeler's dilemma
Smith, E. A. (1988) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00053292 · Cited by 26
An Action Assembly Perspective on Social Skill
Greene, J. O., & Geddes, D. (1993) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1993.tb00054.x · Cited by 26
Optimization theory: A too narrow path
Heyman, G. M. (1988) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00053152 · Cited by 26
PersonaFlow: Designing LLM-Simulated Expert Perspectives for Enhanced Research Ideation
Liu, Y., Sharma, P., Oswal, M., Xia, H., & Huang, Y. (2025) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3715336.3735789 · Cited by 76
Popper’s Paradoxical Pursuit of Natural Philosophy
Maxwell, N. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cco9781139046503.007 · Cited by 25
Twenty Years Beyond the Turing Test: Moving Beyond the Human Judges Too
Hernández‐Orallo, J. (2020) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-020-09549-0 · Cited by 28
Spatola, N., Marchesi, S., & Wykowska, A. (2021) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2021.666586 · Cited by 23
Bringing Together Ergonomic Concepts and Cognitive Mechanisms for Human—AI Agents Cooperation
Guillou, M. L., Prévot, L., & Berberian, B. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2129741 · Cited by 34
When narrative takes over: The representation of embedded mindstates in Shakespeare’s Othello
van Duijn, M. J., Sluiter, I., & Verhagen, A. (2015) · Language and Literature International Journal of Stylistics · doi:10.1177/0963947015572274 · Cited by 24
Fultot, M. F., Frazier, P. A., Turvey, M. T., & Carello, C. (2019) · Ecological Psychology · doi:10.1080/10407413.2019.1615205 · Cited by 25
Roselli, C., Ciardo, F., & Wykowska, A. (2021) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218211042003 · Cited by 24
Homunculi rule: Reflections on Darwinian populations and natural selection by Peter Godfrey Smith
Dennett, D. C. (2010) · Biology & Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10539-010-9242-2 · Cited by 23
Self-citationInformation, inference and meaning in primate vocal behaviour
Fischer, J. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139003551.017 · Cited by 23
Adopting the Intentional Stance Towards Humanoid Robots
Pérez-Osorio, J., & Wykowska, A. (2019) · Wording Robotics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-17974-8_10 · Cited by 17
Ntuen, C. A., Balogun, O., Boyle, E., & Turner, A. (2006) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140130600613083 · Cited by 23
Thinking and Computing: Computers as Special Kinds of Signs
Fetzer, J. H. (1997) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1023/a:1008230900201 · Cited by 23
Integrating Systems Thinking and Behavioural Science
Parkinson, J. A., Gould, A., Knowles, N., West, J., & Goodman, A. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15040403 · Cited by 24
Bullot, N. J., & Rysiew, P. (2006) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2006.09.006 · Cited by 21
Harman, G. H. (1999) · doi:10.1093/0198238029.003.0002 · Cited by 22
Fintech Agents: Technologies and Theories
Pal, A., Gopi, S., & Lee, K. M. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12153301 · Cited by 28
More Than You Expect: Priors Influence on the Adoption of Intentional Stance Toward Humanoid Robots
Pérez-Osorio, J., Marchesi, S., Ghiglino, D., et al. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-35888-4_12 · Cited by 22
Delusions and madmen: against rationality constraints on belief
Smithies, D., Lennon, P., & Samuels, R. J. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03632-y · Cited by 21
Tool vs. agent: attributing agency to natural language generation systems
Henrickson, L. (2018) · Digital Creativity · doi:10.1080/14626268.2018.1482924 · Cited by 21
Carruthers, P. (1987) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/bf00484740 · Cited by 21
Ratajczyk, D. (2022) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-022-00905-x · Cited by 27
The missing self in scientific psychiatry
Tekin, Ş. (2017) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1324-0 · Cited by 21
Antecedents, Manifestations, and Consequences of Belief in Mind–Body Dualism
Forstmann, M., & Burgmer, P. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57306-9_8 · Cited by 19
Pragmatism and Reasons for Belief
Harman, G. H. (1999) · doi:10.1093/0198238029.003.0005 · Cited by 23
The Cambridge History of Philosophy, 1945–2015
(2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316779651 · Cited by 21
Intentionality: Some Lessons from the History of the Problem from Brentano to the Present
Moran, D. (2013) · International Journal of Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1080/09672559.2013.812605 · Cited by 21
Pika, S., Klein, H., Bunel, S., Baas, P., Théleste, E., & Deschner, T. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-43301-8 · Cited by 20
Ciardo, F., Tommaso, D. D., & Wykowska, A. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107237 · Cited by 21
Are Humans the Only Rational Animals?
Melis, G., & Monsó, S. (2023) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.1093/pq/pqad090 · Cited by 20
Presence and general principles of brain function
Sjölie, D. (2012) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2012.04.004 · Cited by 20
Does Visual Perspective Matter in Imitation?
Sambrook, T. D. (1998) · Perception · doi:10.1068/p271461 · Cited by 20
Cognitive load increases anthropomorphism of humanoid robot. The automatic path of anthropomorphism.Preprint
Spatola, N., & Chaminade, T. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/kd4ge · Cited by 20
Argumentation Theory Without Presumptions
Lewiński, M. (2017) · Argumentation · doi:10.1007/s10503-017-9421-2 · Cited by 19
Refining the Inferential Model of Scientific Understanding
Newman, M. (2013) · International Studies in the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1080/02698595.2013.813253 · Cited by 19
THE PHILOSOPHY OF AI AND THE AI OF PHILOSOPHY
McCarthy, J. (2008) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-51726-5.50022-4 · Cited by 24
Transmission of Acquired Information in Nonhuman Primates
Fischer, J. (2008) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012370509-9.00055-3 · Cited by 19
Dennett, D. C. (2008) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2007.00325.x · Cited by 19
Self-citationBaker, L. R. (1989) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/289489 · Cited by 19
What intuitions about homunculi don't show
Block, N. J. (1980) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0000577x · Cited by 19
Psychologism, Folk Psychology and One's Own Case
Montgomery, R. (1987) · Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.1987.tb00095.x · Cited by 19
A republic for all sentients: Social freedom without free will
Paez, E. (2021) · Pacific philosophical quarterly · doi:10.1111/papq.12351 · Cited by 18
Trust Me on This One: Conforming to Conversational Assistants
Schreuter, D., van der Putten, P., & Lamers, M. H. (2021) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-021-09581-8 · Cited by 19
Pfeifer, R. (2002) · IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication (RO-MAN) · doi:10.1109/roman.1993.367683 · Cited by 18
Neuroscience, Embodiment, and Development
Marshall, P. J. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy107 · Cited by 20
Attributions of intent and moral responsibility to AI agents
Ayad, R., & Plaks, J. E. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100107 · Cited by 23
Beyond different levels: embodiment and the developmental system
Marshall, P. J. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00929 · Cited by 19
A Counterexample to Six Fundamental Principles of Belief Formation
Rott, H. (2004) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/1-4020-4094-6_2 · Cited by 17
Agent-Oriented Modeling and Agent-Based Simulation
Wagner, G., & Tulba, F. (2003) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-39597-3_20 · Cited by 17
Cognitive load affects early processes involved in mentalizing robot behaviour
Spatola, N., Marchesi, S., & Wykowska, A. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-19213-5 · Cited by 20
Robots, Dennett and the autonomous: a terminological investigation
Schmidt, C., & Kraemer, F. (2006) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-006-9014-6 · Cited by 16
Investigating the Effects of Robotic Displays of Protest and Distress
Briggs, G., & Scheutz, M. J. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-34103-8_24 · Cited by 16
The Mind in the Machine: Mind Perception Modulates Gaze Aversion During Child–Robot Interaction
Desideri, L., Bonifacci, P., Croati, G., Dalena, A., Gesualdo, M., Molinario, G., Gherardini, A., Cesario, L., & Ottaviani, C. (2020) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-020-00656-7 · Cited by 14
McCarthy, J. (2000) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-1567-8_2 · Cited by 18
Multiple Personality and Personal Identity
Wilkes, K. V. (1981) · The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1093/bjps/32.4.331 · Cited by 16
The functionalist reply (Ohio State)
Lycan, W. G. (1980) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00005860 · Cited by 16
A Counterexample to Six Fundamental Principles of Belief Formation
Rott, H. (2004) · Synthese · doi:10.1023/b:synt.0000024914.61925.5b · Cited by 16
Hofstadter, D. R. (1980) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00005847 · Cited by 16
Communicative and Cognitive Underpinnings of Animal Group Movement
Fischer, J., & Zinner, D. P. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15355-6_13 · Cited by 15
A Middleware for Managing Non-Functional Requirements in Cloud PaaS
Braubach, L., Jander, K., & Pokahr, A. (2014) · International Conference on Cloud and Autonomic Computing (ICCAC) · doi:10.1109/iccac.2014.32 · Cited by 15
Bennett, C. C., Bae, Y., Yoon, J. H., Chae, Y., Yoon, E., Lee, S., Ryu, U., Kim, S., & Weiss, B. (2023) · Computer Speech and Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2023.101521 · Cited by 15
Intentionality in Interacting with Companion Systems – An Empirical Approach
Rösner, D., Friesen, R., Otto, M., Lange, J., Haase, M., & Frommer, J. (2011) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21616-9_67 · Cited by 15
Piredda, G. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02061 · Cited by 15
Cappelen, H. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316344118.005 · Cited by 20
Kaßens-Noor, E. (2019) · Environment and Planning A Economy and Space · doi:10.1177/0308518x19857104 · Cited by 15
Stoecker, R. (2009) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/00201740902917135 · Cited by 15
On Wittgenstein on Cognitive Science
Proudfoot, D. (1997) · Philosophy · doi:10.1017/s0031819100056849 · Cited by 16
Alvarez, M., & Hyman, J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316779651.010 · Cited by 14
Tasks for a theoretical psychology of emotion
Reisenzein, R. (2021) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2021.1992356 · Cited by 15
Type of Education Affects Individuals’ Adoption of Intentional Stance Towards Robots: An EEG Study
Roselli, C., Navare, U. P., Ciardo, F., & Wykowska, A. (2023) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-023-01073-2 · Cited by 13
Mental Models of a Mobile Shoe Rack
Rueben, M., Klow, J., Duer, M., Zimmerman, E. M., Piacentini, J., Browning, M., Bernieri, F. J., Grimm, C. M., & Smart, W. D. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3442620 · Cited by 14
Can Autonomous Agents Without Phenomenal Consciousness Be Morally Responsible?
Bernáth, L. (2021) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-021-00462-7 · Cited by 16
Creative AI: Music Composition Programs as an Extension of the Composer’s Mind
Moruzzi, C. (2018) · Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96448-5_8 · Cited by 14
Joslyn, C. (1995) · World Futures · doi:10.1080/02604027.1995.9972555 · Cited by 14
On the Post‐Wittgensteinian Critique of the Concept of Action in Sociology
Porpora, D. V. (1983) · Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.1983.tb00467.x · Cited by 14
A Kantian Stance on the Intentional Stance
Ratcliffe, M. (2001) · Biology & Philosophy · doi:10.1023/a:1006710821443 · Cited by 14
How to turn an information processor into an understander
Sloman, A., & Croucher, M. (1980) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00005999 · Cited by 14
Generative AI, Quadruple Deception & Trust
Simon, J. (2025) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2025.2491087 · Cited by 21
Cognitive Impact of Anthropomorphized Robot Gaze
Spatola, N., & Huguet, P. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3459994 · Cited by 13
AI as Philosophical Ideology: A Critical look back at John McCarthy’s Program
Anderson, M. M. (2024) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-024-00731-1 · Cited by 12
Interventionism for the Intentional Stance: True Believers and Their Brains
Eronen, M. I. (2017) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-017-9513-5 · Cited by 13
The Race Between Cognitive and Artificial Intelligence
Arora, A. S., & Arora, A. (2019) · International Journal of Intelligent Information Technologies · doi:10.4018/ijiit.2020010101 · Cited by 13
Ghiglino, D., Willemse, C., Tommaso, D. D., & Wykowska, A. (2021) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2021.642796 · Cited by 12
Minsky, M. (1980) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00005914 · Cited by 13
Armchair Metaphysics Revisited
Jackson, F. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316344118.008 · Cited by 13
Developments and Debates in the Historiography of Philosophy
Beaney, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316779651.058 · Cited by 12
The Matrix of AI Agency: On the Demarcation Problem in Social Theory
Anicker, F., Flaßhoff, G., & Marcinkowski, F. (2024) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1177/07352751241289925 · Cited by 12
Exploring Data-Driven Components of Socially Intelligent AI through Cooperative Game Paradigms
Bennett, C. C., Weiß, B., Suh, J., Yoon, E., Jeong, J., & Chae, Y. (2022) · Multimodal Technologies and Interaction · doi:10.3390/mti6020016 · Cited by 13
Collaborative Autonomy: Human–Robot Interaction to the Test of Intelligent Help
Cantucci, F., & Falcone, R. (2022) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics11193065 · Cited by 12
The History of Philosophy of Science
Ladyman, J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316779651.017 · Cited by 11
The Intrinsic Quality of Experience
Harman, G. H. (1999) · doi:10.1093/0198238029.003.0015 · Cited by 12
Searle's argument is just a set of Chinese symbols
Abelson, R. P. (1980) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00005768 · Cited by 12
The Pseudorealization Fallacy and the Chinese Room Argument
Moor, J. H. (1988) · Studies in cognitive systems · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-2699-8_2 · Cited by 12
Simplicity as a Pragmatic Criterion for Deciding What Hypotheses to Take Seriously
Harman, G. H. (1999) · doi:10.1093/0198238029.003.0004 · Cited by 12
Peut-on observer l’interprétation ?
Conein, B. (1990) · Éditions de l’École des hautes études en sciences sociales eBooks · doi:10.4000/books.editionsehess.25422 · Cited by 12
Why ChatGPT doesn’t think: an argument from rationality
Stoljar, D., & Zhang, Z. V. (2024) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2024.2427061 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Dennett, D. C., & The Journal of Philosophy, I.
- Corresponding author
- Dennett, D. C.
- ORCID
- Dennett, D. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Philosophy
- Publisher
- Philosophy Documentation Center
- Published
- 1971
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 87-106
- ISSN
- 0022-362X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4252582630
- Cited by
- 994
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 3.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Philosophy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
- Keywords
- intentional systems, intentionality, philosophy of mind
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review