The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intentional Systems
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It is well-received in both the philosophical and the computer science literature that knowledge of such higher-level regularities does not presuppose knowledge of the finer details of the system”
From AI, Opacity, and Personal Autonomy (2022) · cites this paper as Dennett, 1971
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Searle, J. R. (1980) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00005756 · Cited by 6,954
Fractionating theory of mind: a meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies
Schurz, M., Radua, J., Aichhorn, M., Richlan, F., & Perner, J. (2014) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.01.009 · Cited by 1,656
Burge, T. (2010) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199581405.001.0001 · Cited by 1,169
Intentional systems in cognitive ethology: The “Panglossian paradigm” defended
Dennett, D. C. (1983) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00016393 · Cited by 1,079
Self-citationSchurz, M., Raduà, J., Tholen, M. G., Maliske, L., Margulies, D. S., Mars, R. B., Sallet, J., & Kanske, P. (2020) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000303 · Cited by 702
Metadata
- Authors
- Dennett, D. C., & The Journal of Philosophy, I.
- Corresponding author
- Dennett, D. C.
- ORCID
- Dennett, D. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Philosophy
- Publisher
- Philosophy Documentation Center
- Published
- 1971
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 87-106
- ISSN
- 0022-362X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4252582630
- Cited by
- 994
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 3.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Philosophy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
- Keywords
- intentional systems, intentionality, philosophy of mind
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
