The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Living under Contract: Contract Farming and Agrarian Transformation in Sub-Saharan Africa
Abstract
Wracked by poverty, famine, and drought, Africa is typically represented as agriculturally stagnant, backward, and crisis-prone. This text, however, highlights the changing character of sub-Saharan agrarian systems by focusing on contract farming. A relatively new and increasingly widespread way of organising peasant agriculture, contract farming promotes production of a wide variety of crops - from flowers to cocoa, from fresh vegetables to rice - under contract to agribusinesses, exporters, and processers. The proliferation of African growers producing under contract is in fact part of broader changes in the global agro-food system. In this examination of agricultural restructuring and its effect upon various African societies. The editors bring together anthropologists, economists, geographers, political scientists, and sociologists to explore the origins, forms, and consequences of contract production in several African countries, particularly Kenya, the Gambia, Zimbabwe, and the Ivory Coast. Documenting how contract production links farmers, agribusiness, and the state, the contributors examine problematic aspects of this method of agrarian reform. Their case studies, based on long-term field work and analysis at the village and household level, chart the complex effects of contract production on the organisation of work and the labour process, rural inequality, gender relations, labour markets, local accumulation strategies, and regional development. Living under reveals that contract farming represents a distinctive form in which African growers are incorporated into national and world markets. Contract production, which has been a central feature of the agricultural landscape in the advanced capitalist states, is an emerging strategy for capturing peasants and for confronting the agrarian question in the late 20th century.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2017) · The SHAFR Guide Online · doi:10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim010030027 · Cited by 3,263
The new enclosures: critical perspectives on corporate land deals
White, B., Borras Jr., S. M., Hall, R., Scoones, I., & Wolford, W. (2012) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2012.691879 · Cited by 913
Key, N., & Runsten, D. (1999) · World Development · doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(98)00144-2 · Cited by 745
Hall, R., Edelman, M., Borras, S. M., Scoones, I., White, B., & Wolford, W. (2015) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2015.1036746 · Cited by 608
Processes of inclusion and adverse incorporation: oil palm and agrarian change in Sumatra, Indonesia
McCarthy, J. F. (2010) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2010.512460 · Cited by 521
Metadata
- Authors
- Grosh, B., Little, P. D., & Watts, M. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Interdisciplinary History
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 368
- ISSN
- 0022-1953 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017981799
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Living under Contract: Contract Farming and Agrarian Transformation in Sub-Saharan Africa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/205223
- The paper
- Grosh, B., Little, P. D., & Watts, M. J. (1996). Living under Contract: Contract Farming and Agrarian Transformation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Interdisciplinary History. https://doi.org/10.2307/205223
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.