The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Resistance, acquiescence or incorporation? An introduction to land grabbing and political reactions ‘from below’
Open accessAbstract
Political reactions ‘from below’ to global land grabbing have been vastly more varied and complex than is usually assumed. This essay introduces a collection of ground-breaking studies that discuss responses that range from various types of organized and everyday resistance to demands for incorporation or for better terms of incorporation into land deals. Initiatives ‘from below’ in response to land deals have involved local and transnational alliances and the use of legal and extra-legal methods, and have brought victories and defeats. The relevance of political reactions to land grabbing is discussed in light of theories of social movements and critical agrarian studies. Future research on reactions ‘from below’ to land grabbing must include greater attention to gender and generational differences in both impacts and political agency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Brief History of Neoliberalism
Harvey, D. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199283262.001.0001 · Cited by 16,394
Olson, M. (1965) · doi:10.4159/9780674041660 · Cited by 14,191
The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups.
Sufrin, S. C., & Olson, M. (1966) · Industrial and Labor Relations Review · doi:10.2307/2521228 · Cited by 11,518
A Brief History of Neoliberalism
(2020) · The Anti-Capitalist Chronicles · doi:10.2307/j.ctv17ppcd0.8 · Cited by 9,074
The other path: the invisible revolution in the third world
(1990) · Futures · doi:10.1016/0016-3287(90)90116-y · Cited by 1,984
Green Grabbing: a new appropriation of nature?
Fairhead, J., Leach, M., & Scoones, I. (2012) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2012.671770 · Cited by 1,928
Self-citationPassionate Politics: Emotions and Social Movements
Goodwin, J., Jasper, J. M., & Polletta, F. (2001) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226304007.001.0001 · Cited by 1,440
The rational peasant: The political economy of peasant society
Popkin, S. (1980) · Theory and Society · doi:10.1007/bf00158397 · Cited by 1,280
New frontiers of land control: Introduction
Peluso, N. L., & Lund, C. (2011) · Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2011.607692 · Cited by 1,181
Rightful Resistance in Rural China
O'Brien, K. J., & Li, L. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791086 · Cited by 1,104
Cited by
Franco, J. C., & Borras, S. M. (2019) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.013 · Cited by 150
Self-citationGreen economy, degradation narratives, and land-use conflicts in Tanzania
Bergius, M., Benjaminsen, T. A., Maganga, F., & Buhaug, H. (2020) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104850 · Cited by 135
Global extractivisms and transformative alternatives
Nygren, A., Kröger, M., & Gills, B. (2022) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2022.2069495 · Cited by 85
Agri-bolsonarism : a movement led by agricultural elites and far-right politicians in Brazil
Pompeia, C. (2024) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2023.2301440 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Hall, R., Edelman, M., Borras, S. M., Scoones, I., White, B., & Wolford, W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Peasant Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-05-12
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 467-488
- ISSN
- 0306-6150 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-9361
- OpenAlex
- W1598491672
- Cited by
- 608
- References
- 79
- FWCI
- 176.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resistance, acquiescence or incorporation? An introduction to land grabbing and political reactions ‘from below’. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03066150.2015.1036746
- The paper
- Hall, R., Edelman, M., Borras, S. M., Scoones, I., White, B., & Wolford, W. (2015). Resistance, acquiescence or incorporation? An introduction to land grabbing and political reactions ‘from below’. The Journal of Peasant Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2015.1036746
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
