The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measuring Inequality: A Methodological Handbook.
Abstract
The impetus to write this book grew out of curiosity and frustration. For a research project in which I was involved, I wanted to select an appropriate index to measure inequality, so I searched for a book that comprehensively reviewed the available indexes, identified their operational similarities and differences, and clarified their theoretical undetpinnings. Discovering that no such book existed, I became increasingly frustrated and curious. It became evident that I would have to undertake my own systematic review of the literature, presumably in my own discipline, in order to identify the alternative measures and choose an appropriate one on the basis of proper theoretical and methodological criteria. This effort led to additional frustrating discoveries. First, I encountered a bewildering abundance of inequality indexeswell over ftfty distinguishable measures. Second, my review of the methodological literature on inequality measurement took me through the issues of literally scores of professional journals in five academic disciplines-economics, geography, political science, sociology, and statistics. Third, although I found some cross-disciplinary referencing of inequality measures, by and large each discipline's inequality measurement remained insulated from that of other disciplines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market
Salganik, M. J., Dodds, P. S., & Watts, D. J. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1121066 · Cited by 2,231
Beyond Food Deserts: Measuring and Mapping Racial Disparities in Neighborhood Food Environments
Raja, S., Ma, C., & Yadav, P. (2008) · Journal of Planning Education and Research · doi:10.1177/0739456x08317461 · Cited by 358
Global mismatch between greenhouse gas emissions and the burden of climate change
Althor, G., Watson, J. E. M., & Fuller, R. A. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep20281 · Cited by 353
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-4263 · Cited by 340
State-level income inequality and individual mortality risk: a prospective, multilevel study
(2001) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.91.3.385 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- South, S., & Coulter, P. B.
- Venue
- Contemporary Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1990-09
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 667
- ISSN
- 0094-3061 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2031479359
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring Inequality: A Methodological Handbook. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2072306
- The paper
- South, S., & Coulter, P. B. (1990). Measuring Inequality: A Methodological Handbook. Contemporary Sociology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2072306
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.