The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Contested Frontiers in Amazonia.
Abstract
Based on 15 years of research in Brazil, this book is an interdisciplinary documentation and analysis of the process of frontier change in one region of the Brazilian Amazon, the southern region of the state of Para. The authors' analysis was based on the idea that what they documented in the field - deforestation, settlement patterns, and the intensity of rural violence, for example - were the outcomes of the competition for resources among social groups capable of mobilizing varying degrees of power. The analysis of these contests illustrates how national and international factors often shaped events at the local level, thereby propelling the story of frontier expansion in different and unexpected directions. Part One focuses on Amazonia as a whole. The authors review the history of the region, and analyze the federal and state policies that set into motion the contemporary process of frontier expansion. In parts Two and Three, they present the results of their empirical work on the evolution of frontier communities in southern Para. Each local history develops the general themes put forth in the first section. The final chapter brings the text back to larger issues of understanding such frontier change, especially in light of the country's anthropological, sociological, and demographic shifts and collisions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths
Lambin, E. F., Turner, B. L., Geist, H. J., Agbola, S. B., Angelsen, A., Bruce, J. W., Coomes, O. T., Dirzo, R., Fischer, G., Folke, C., et al. (2001) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/s0959-3780(01)00007-3 · Cited by 3,788
Ribot, J. C., & Peluso, N. L. (2003) · Rural Sociology · doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00133.x · Cited by 2,355
Power, knowledge and political ecology in the third world: a review
Bryant, R. L. (1998) · Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment · doi:10.1177/030913339802200104 · Cited by 608
What Drives Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon?
Pfaff, A. S. P. (1999) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1006/jeem.1998.1056 · Cited by 571
Christopher Brown, J., & Purcell, M. (2005) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.09.001 · Cited by 470
Metadata
- Authors
- Ciccantell, P. S., Schmink, M., & Wood, C. H.
- Venue
- Contemporary Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81
- ISSN
- 0094-3061 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2068461684
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 47.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contested Frontiers in Amazonia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2074888
- The paper
- Ciccantell, P. S., Schmink, M., & Wood, C. H. (1994). Contested Frontiers in Amazonia. Contemporary Sociology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2074888
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.