Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 673

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations.

Open access
Guilarte, Miguel, Marin, Bernd, Mayntz, Renate·1994·Contemporary Sociology

Abstract

Political governance in modern societies can no longer be conceived in terms of external government control of society but emerges from a plurality of governing agents. In contemporary policy making, governmental and non-governmental actors are interconnected in complex networks of interaction, exchanging information and other resources. This reader presents the results of empirical network studies in a variety of policy sectors and in different countries. It also provides insights into innovative quantitative and qualitative approaches to network analysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2075363

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Guilarte, M., Marin, B., & Mayntz, R.
Venue
Contemporary Sociology
Published
1994-05
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
425
ISSN
0094-3061 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068007822
Cited by
673
References
1
FWCI
71.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2075363
The paper
Guilarte, M., Marin, B., & Mayntz, R. (1994). Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations. Contemporary Sociology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2075363

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.