The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Research on Policy Implementation: Assessment and Prospects
Abstract
While policy implementation no longer frames the core question of public management and public policy, some scholars have debated appropriate steps for revitalization. And the practical world stands just as much in need now of valid knowledge about policy implementation as ever. Where has all the policy implementation gone? Or at least all the scholarly signs of it? And why? What has the field accomplished? Should a resurgence of attention to the subject be exhorted? And if so, in what directions? This article considers these questions as foci of an assessment of the state of the field, and the argument reaches somewhat unconventional conclusions: There is more here than meets the eye. While modest to moderate progress can be noted on a number of fronts, an initial assessment is likely to understate the extent of work underway on matters quite close to the implementation theme. Research on policy implementation-like questions has partially transmogrified. One has to look, sometimes, in unusual places and be informed by a broader logic of intellectual development to make sense of the relevant scholarship. Policy implementation work, in short, continues to bear relevance for important themes of policy and management. But some of the discourse has shifted, the questions have broadened, and the agenda has become complicated. Research on implementation, under whatever currently fashionable labels, is alive and lively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources
Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994) · University of Michigan Press eBooks · doi:10.3998/mpub.9739 · Cited by 3,732
Games Real Actors Play: Actor-centered Institutionalism In Policy Research
Scharpf, F. W. (1997) · Cited by 2,547
Synthesizing the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-Conflict Model of Policy Implementation
(1995) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037242 · Cited by 1,512
Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988.
Russell, J. M., & Stone, C. N. (1991) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/2163449 · Cited by 1,302
Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations.
Guilarte, M., Marin, B., & Mayntz, R. (1994) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2075363 · Cited by 673
Implementation Theory and Practice: Toward a Third Generation
Goggin, M. L. (1990) · Cited by 630
Modeling the Impact of Public Management: Implications of Structural Context
O'Toole, L. J., & Meier, K. J. (1999) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024421 · Cited by 554
Self-citationBardach, E. (1977) · Cited by 429
Inside the Welfare Contract: Discretion and Accountability in State Welfare Administration
Brodkin, E. Z. (1997) · Social Service Review · doi:10.1086/604228 · Cited by 365
Policy Recommendations for Multi-Actor Implementation: An Assessment of the Field
O'Toole, L. J. (1986) · Journal of Public Policy · doi:10.1017/s0143814x00006486 · Cited by 346
Self-citation
Cited by
Policy Implementation, Street-level Bureaucracy, and the Importance of Discretion
Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2014) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.841978 · Cited by 535
Nilsen, P., Ståhl, C., Roback, K., & Cairney, P. (2013) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-63 · Cited by 346
The Theory–Practice Issue in Policy Implementation Research
O'toole, L. J. (2004) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00396.x · Cited by 235
Self-citationWhat happens on the ground: Persistent issues in implementation research
Hupe, P. (2014) · Public Policy and Administration · doi:10.1177/0952076713518339 · Cited by 146
Mamman, A., Bawole, J., Agbebi, M., & Alhassan, A.-R. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.044 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Toole, L. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-04-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 263-288
- ISSN
- 1053-1858 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9803
- OpenAlex
- W2095807160
- Cited by
- 773
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 18.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Research on Policy Implementation: Assessment and Prospects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024270
- The paper
- O'Toole, L. J. (2000). Research on Policy Implementation: Assessment and Prospects. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024270
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.