The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Some Principles of Stratification
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The measurement of SES in health research: current practice and steps toward a new approach
Oakes, J. M., & Rossi, P. H. (2003) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00073-4 · Cited by 1,116
Wealth and Stratification Processes
Spilerman, S. (2000) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.497 · Cited by 457
The functions and dysfunctions of hierarchy
Anderson, C., & Brown, C. E. (2010) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2010.08.002 · Cited by 395
Mijs, J. J. B. (2016) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-014-0228-0 · Cited by 290
Household possessions and wealth in agrarian states: Implications for archaeology
Smith, M. E. (1987) · Journal of Anthropological Archaeology · doi:10.1016/0278-4165(87)90004-3 · Cited by 155
Narcissistic Responding to Ego Threat: When the Status of the Evaluator Matters
Horton, R. S., & Sedikides, C. (2009) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00590.x · Cited by 115
Occupational Prestige: The Status Component of Socioeconomic Status
Hughes, B. T., Srivastava, S., Leszko, M., & Condon, D. M. (2024) · Collabra: Psychology · doi:10.1525/collabra.92882 · Cited by 44
Workman, J. (2022) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102744 · Cited by 27
Becker, D. (2013) · Rationality and Society · doi:10.1177/1043463113504448 · Cited by 28
Giani, M. S. (2019) · Educational Policy · doi:10.1177/0895904817745375 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Davis, K., & Moore, W. E.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1945-04
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 242
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4292081241
- Cited by
- 995
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.