Cited by 395Social Power and Status DynamicsTeam Dynamics and PerformanceLeadership and Management in Organizations

The functions and dysfunctions of hierarchy

Anderson, Cameron, Brown, Courtney E.·2010·Research in Organizational Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.riob.2010.08.002

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, C., & Brown, C. E.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Anderson, Cameron
Venue
Research in Organizational Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
30
Pages
55-89
ISSN
0191-3085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2124108810
Cited by
395
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 6
FWCI
24.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Research in Organizational Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
Keywords
organizational hierarchy, functionalist theory, leadership, power, status, small group communication, compensation systems, leadership selection, team motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review