The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hawthorne Revisited: Management and the Worker, Its Critics, and Developments in Human Relations in Industry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kurt Lewin and the Origins of Action Research
Adelman, C. (1993) · Educational Action Research · doi:10.1080/0965079930010102 · Cited by 913
Engineering in K–12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects
(2010) · INSIGHT · doi:10.1002/inst.20101338 · Cited by 816
Empathic concern drives costly altruism
FeldmanHall, O., Dalgleish, T., Evans, D., & Mobbs, D. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.043 · Cited by 349
Evaluating Recommender Systems: Survey and Framework
Zangerle, E., & Bauer, C. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3556536 · Cited by 283
Jones, M., & Alony, I. (2011) · International Journal of Doctoral Studies · doi:10.28945/1429 · Cited by 246
“The other bias is known as ‘the Hawthorne effect’ (Landsberger, 1958).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, S. M., & Landsberger, H. A.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1959-04
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 277
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060322584
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hawthorne Revisited: Management and the Worker, Its Critics, and Developments in Human Relations in Industry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2089456
- The paper
- Miller, S. M., & Landsberger, H. A. (1959). Hawthorne Revisited: Management and the Worker, Its Critics, and Developments in Human Relations in Industry. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089456
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
