Cited by 3,588Phenomenology and Existential PhilosophyContemporary Sociological Theory and PracticeCritical Realism in Sociology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The phenomenology of the social world

Bittner, Egon, Schutz, Alfred, Walsh, George, Lehnert, Frederick·1968·American Sociological Review

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2092457

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bittner, E., Schutz, A., Walsh, G., & Lehnert, F.
Venue
American Sociological Review
Published
1968-08
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
639
ISSN
0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2340109459
Cited by
3,588
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 126 · 2023: 163 · 2022: 212 · 2021: 202 · 2020: 252 · 2019: 237 · 2018: 140 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 132 · 2015: 121 · 2014: 119 · 2013: 105 · 2012: 107
FWCI
84.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Realism in Sociology
Keywords
phenomenology, social world, lived experience, social reality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review