The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On Using Informants: A Technique for Collecting Quantitative Data and Controlling Measurement Error in Organization Analysis
Abstract
John Seidler, On Using Informants: A Technique for Collecting Quantitative Data and Controlling Measurement Error in Organization Analysis, American Sociological Review, Vol. 39, No. 6 (Dec., 1974), pp. 816-831
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Argonauts of the Western Pacific
Malinowski, B. (2002) · doi:10.4324/9780203421260 · Cited by 2,160
Cited by
Assessing construct validity in organizational research
Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. (1991) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393203 · Cited by 6,621
Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection
Tongco, M. D. C. (2007) · Ethnobotany Research and Applications · doi:10.17348/era.5.0.147-158 · Cited by 2,597
(2000) · Cited by 2,531
CONDUCTING INTERORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH USING KEY INFORMANTS.
KUMAR, N., STERN, L. W., & ANDERSON, J. C. (1993) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256824 · Cited by 2,467
Representing and Testing Organizational Theories: A Holistic Construal
Bagozzi, R. P., & Phillips, L. W. (1982) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392322 · Cited by 2,064
Common methods bias: does common methods variance really bias results?
Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H. (1998) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/109442819814002 · Cited by 1,380
Glick, W. H. (1985) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1985.4279045 · Cited by 1,286
FIT, EQUIFINALITY, AND ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS: A TEST OF TWO CONFIGURATIONAL THEORIES.
DOTY, D. H., GLICK, W. H., & HUBER, G. P. (1993) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/256810 · Cited by 1,198
What Drives Key Informant Accuracy?
Homburg, C., Klarmann, M., Reimann, M., & Schilke, O. (2012) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.09.0174 · Cited by 276
Preparing for the worst: the process of effective crisis management
Reilly, A. H. (1993) · Industrial & Environmental Crisis Quarterly · doi:10.1177/108602669300700204 · Cited by 89
Barcomb, A., Kaufmann, A., Riehle, D., Stol, K.-J., & Fitzgerald, B. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2018.2872713 · Cited by 44
Developing and validating an international business negotiator’s profile: The China context
Shi, X., & Wright, P. C. (2001) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/eum0000000005523 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Seidler, J.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1974-12
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 816
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2330249940
- Cited by
- 587
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
