The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adult Development and Social Theory: A Paradigmatic Reappraisal
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
(1980) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.137.11.1348 · Cited by 180
Cited by
Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives.
Maruna, S. (2001) · doi:10.1037/10430-000 · Cited by 3,575
Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543067001088 · Cited by 3,181
Baltes, P. B. (1987) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.23.5.611 · Cited by 2,781
Psychological Needs and the Facilitation of Integrative Processes
Ryan, R. M. (1995) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00501.x · Cited by 2,245
How do adolescents see their future? A review of the development of future orientation and planning
NURMI, J. (1991) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/0273-2297(91)90002-6 · Cited by 1,252
Metadata
- Authors
- Dannefer, D.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1984-02
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 100
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043053851
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adult Development and Social Theory: A Paradigmatic Reappraisal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2095560
- The paper
- Dannefer, D. (1984). Adult Development and Social Theory: A Paradigmatic Reappraisal. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095560
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
