Cited by 1,071Memory, History, Trauma, IdentityMemory, Trauma, and CommemorationMemory, violence, and history

Generations and Collective Memories

Schuman, Howard, Scott, Jacqueline·1989·American Sociological Review

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2095611

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schuman, H., & Scott, J.
Venue
American Sociological Review
Published
1989-06
Volume
54
Issue
3
Pages
359
ISSN
0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4246287444
Cited by
1,071
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 23
FWCI
61.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Memory, History, Trauma, Identity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Memory, violence, and history
Keywords
generational differences, collective memory, intergenerational relations, social memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review