The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cross-National Variation in Occupational Sex Segregation
Abstract
I examine the relationship between the occupational distributions of men and women in 25 industrial countries and selected social, economic, and cultural factors. Recent research suggests counterintuitive international patterns of occupational sex segregation: low levels of segregation in some traditional countries like Japan and Italy, and high levels in the progressive countries of Scandinavia. I argue that the same economic structures that are associated with women's greater integration into the formal labor force also contributes to a deepening institutionalization of gender within the occupational structure. This may occur through the incorporation of women's traditional tasks into the formal economy, and/or through the hierarchical andfunctional differentiation of economic activity in highly industrial societies. Results indicate that some primary structural characteristics of modern economies (a relatively large service sector and a large employee class) are associated with greater female concentration in clerical, sales, and service occupations. However, other social and cultural characteristics of these countries low rates offertility and more favorable ideological environments -partially offset these segregative forces. Furthermore, the actual penetration of egalitarian principles into the labor market appears to be mediated by the structure of interest articulation, with corporatist systems showing greater propensity toward segregation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Becker, G. S. (1991) · doi:10.4159/9780674020665 · Cited by 10,565
Cited by
Indulging Our Gendered Selves? Sex Segregation by Field of Study in 44 Countries
Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2009) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/595942 · Cited by 996
Self-citationEqual but Separate? A Cross-National Study of Sex Segregation in Higher Education
Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2002) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3088946 · Cited by 491
Self-citationYodanis, C. L. (2004) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260504263868 · Cited by 387
A World of Difference: International Trends in Women's Economic Status
Charles, M. (2011) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102548 · Cited by 263
Self-citationGreckhamer, T. (2011) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840610380806 · Cited by 200
Metadata
- Authors
- Charles, M.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1992-08
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 483
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2327142669
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cross-National Variation in Occupational Sex Segregation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2096096
- The paper
- Charles, M. (1992). Cross-National Variation in Occupational Sex Segregation. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096096
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.