Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 202

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Income Inequality, Development, and Dualism: Results from an Unbalanced Cross-National Panel

Nielsen, Francois, Alderson, Arthur S.·1995·American Sociological Review

Abstract

Les AA. etudient les relations entre inegalites en matiere de revenu et le developpement economique a partir de donnees internationales collectees entre 1952 et 1988 et concernant 88 pays. Ils montrent que ce type de relation suit la courbe en forme de U inverse du modele de Simon Kuznets. Ils examinent un certain nombre de variables susceptibles d'expliquer ce type de relation : le developpement de l'industrie, celui de l'agriculture, celui du systeme educatif, la situation demographique. Ces facteurs exercent une influence importante sur les inegalites de revenu

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2096317

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 202

Metadata

Authors
Nielsen, F., & Alderson, A. S.
Venue
American Sociological Review
Published
1995-10
Volume
60
Issue
5
Pages
674
ISSN
0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2331833101
Cited by
202
References
3
FWCI
6.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Income Inequality, Development, and Dualism: Results from an Unbalanced Cross-National Panel. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2096317
The paper
Nielsen, F., & Alderson, A. S. (1995). Income Inequality, Development, and Dualism: Results from an Unbalanced Cross-National Panel. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096317

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.