The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Dynamics and Dilemmas of Collective Action
Abstract
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Heckathorn (1996) also examines a public good model with punishment opportunities.His simulations, which allow for different strategies (types), indicate the importance of punishing types for cooperation.”
From Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments (2000) · cites this paper as Heckathorn (1996)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.90.4.980 · Cited by 4,547
Social dilemmas: the anatomy of cooperation
Kollock, P. (1998) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.183 · Cited by 1,746
How Social Media Facilitates Political Protest: Information, Motivation, and Social Networks
Jost, J. T., Barberá, P., Bonneau, R., Langer, M., Metzger, M., Nagler, J., Sterling, J., & Tucker, J. A. (2018) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12478 · Cited by 492
Religion and economic growth: was Weber right?
Blum, U., & Dudley, L. (2001) · Journal of Evolutionary Economics · doi:10.1007/pl00003862 · Cited by 229
Social values, subjective transformations, and cooperation in social dilemmas
Simpson, B. (2004) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1177/019027250406700404 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Heckathorn, D. D.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1996-04
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 250
- ISSN
- 0003-1224
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review