CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 305Family Dynamics and RelationshipsMarriage and Family DynamicsGender, Labor, and Family Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spousal Alternatives and Marital Dissolution

South, Scott J., Lloyd, Kim M.·1995·American Sociological Review
DOI 10.2307/2096343
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The authors draw on three different data sources to explore the effects of the quantity and quality of potential remarriage partners available in the local marriage market on the risk of marital dissolution. First data from the National Survey of Families and Households are used to demonstrate that among recently-divorced couples a substantial percentage of husbands and wives had been romantically involved with someone other than their spouse prior to divorcing. Then microlevel data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth are merged with aggregated Public Use Microdata from the US census to examine directly the impact of marriage market characteristics and other contextual variables on the risk of marital disruption net of conventional individual-level predictors of divorce. Proportional hazards regression models reveal that among nonhispanic Whites the risk of dissolution is highest where either wives or husbands encounter abundant alternatives to their current spouse. The labor force participation rate of unmarried women and the rate of geographic mobility in the local marriage market also decrease marital stability. In general the results suggest that many persons continue the marital search even while married and that the distribution of spousal alternatives embedded in the social structure influences significantly the risk of marital dissolution. (authors)

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2096343

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
South, S. J., & Lloyd, K. M.
Affiliations
State University of New York (US)
ORCID
South, Scott J.
Venue
American Sociological Review
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
1995-02
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
21
ISSN
0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2307/2096343
OpenAlex
W2052033644
Cited by
305
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 21
FWCI
41.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
divorce, marriage market, remarriage, marital stability, spatial mobility, social structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review